Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 36: 1372-1375, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jessen, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Eckfeldt, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jessen, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Eckfeldt, J. H.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 1372-1375, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Do enzymatic analyses of serum triglycerides really need blanking for free glycerol?

RH Jessen, CJ Dass and JH Eckfeldt
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

Distributions of concentrations of free glycerol in clinical plasma obtained for triglyceride assay were compiled to determine the frequency with which increased concentrations of free glycerol posed a potential problem for clinical interpretation of triglyceride results. Clinical histories were studied in patients with increased concentrations of free glycerol to ascertain possible reasons for the increase and to assess the relative clinical importance of glycerol- blank-corrected triglyceride results. Significant increases in free glycerol were very uncommon, usually occurring in patients receiving glycerol-containing hyperalimentation fluids, those receiving heparin (which causes both in vivo and in vitro increases in free glycerol), or those critically ill. Free glycerol was never increased significantly in a large outpatient population. Monitoring lipid metabolism in critically ill patients, or measuring true triglyceride concentrations in patients receiving glycerol-containing fluids, may represent rare exceptions for which glycerol-blank correction is necessary for accurate clinical diagnosis and management. We conclude that there is insufficient justification for the routine expenditure of extra time and reagents to correct most analytical enzymatic triglyceride methods for free glycerol.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
G. J. Martin and J. S. Rand
Control of diabetes mellitus in cats with porcine insulin zinc suspension
Vet Rec., July 21, 2007; 161(3): 88 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
G. J. Martin and J. S. Rand
Comparisons of different measurements for monitoring diabetic cats treated with porcine insulin zinc suspension
Vet Rec., July 14, 2007; 161(2): 52 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. F. Eder, C. M. McGrath, Y. G. Dowdy, J. E. Tomaszewski, F. M. Rosenberg, R. B. Wilson, B. A. Wolf, and L. M. Shaw
Ethylene glycol poisoning: toxicokinetic and analytical factors affecting laboratory diagnosis
Clin. Chem., January 1, 1998; 44(1): 168 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.