Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 36: 1488-1493, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schramm, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schramm, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, H. H.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 1488-1493, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Determination of free progesterone in an ultrafiltrate of saliva collected in situ

W Schramm, RH Smith, PA Craig, SH Paek and HH Kuo
University of Michigan, Reproductive Sciences Program, Ann Arbor 48109.

We have investigated the utility of an ultrafiltrate of saliva for measuring progesterone as an indicator of luteal function during the menstrual cycle of women. A filtrate of saliva is collected in the mouth by means of an osmotic pump that accumulates medium containing only molecules less than 12,000 Da. We analyzed the nonextracted ultrafiltrate by a solid-phase immunoassay for progesterone and monitored the mid-luteal surge of lutropin in urine with a liquid-phase radioimmunoassay. Progesterone concentrations in the ultrafiltrate are significantly lower during the follicular phase and increase after the release of lutropin. The concentration of progesterone in the ultrafiltrate correlates closely with total progesterone in matched blood samples (r = 0.84, cycle 1; and r = 0.89, cycle 2). Likewise, we found a good correlation between the results in whole saliva and in the ultrafiltrate (r = 0.95). The described method of obtaining a pre- processed specimen noninvasively simplifies the self-collection of samples by patients (including collection at home); excludes potential interference from microorganisms, desquamated cells, and salivary components; and simplifies the processing of the biological fluid in the laboratory.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.