Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 36: 1572-1575, 1990;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Margrey, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Margrey, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. A.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 36, 1572-1575, Copyright © 1990 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

A standard clinical instrument interface for robotic applications

KS Margrey, A Martinez, DP Vaughn and RA Felder
University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Robotics Laboratory, Charlottesville 22908.

Many clinical laboratory instruments are not designed for robotic compatibility, hence the need for standardization of data communications and analyzer interface hardware. We developed an interface with supporting software that simplifies communication between a microcomputer and clinical instruments. Our interface establishes a standardized bidirectional communications protocol, which is useful in many clinical laboratory robotic projects. Instruments targeted for interfacing require no prior on-board communications capabilities. Additionally, modifications to the clinical instrument are minimized. Once installed, the interface translates input commands to codes or actions recognizable by the analyzer. Features not normally available to the user, such as electrode real-time response and full instrument status, are also reported by the interface, thereby establishing a remote monitor and control mechanism for the interfaced instrument. We have written an operating system to control the interface microcomputer, which in turn commands and monitors the clinical analyzer. A host computer controls the information flow to the interface and provides (a) requests to the interface for instrument operation and status and (b) commands to the interface to initiate the desired instrument operation. This arrangement maintains complete instrument functionality as designed by the manufacturer while allowing remote monitoring and operation of the instrument.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.