Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 37: 1781-1787, 1991;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ratcliffe, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ratcliffe, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ratcliffe, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ratcliffe, J. G.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 37, 1781-1787, Copyright © 1991 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Immunoreactivity of plasma parathyrin-related peptide: three region- specific radioimmunoassays and a two-site immunoradiometric assay compared

WA Ratcliffe, S Norbury, RA Stott, DA Heath and JG Ratcliffe
Wolfson Research Laboratories, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, U.K.

We measured parathyrin (parathyroid hormone)-related peptide (PTHRP) in plasma by three region-specific RIAs and compared them with an established two-site immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) of PTHRP1-86 in samples from control subjects and from patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PH) and humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM). The two direct RIAs of PTHRP1-34 and PTHRP37-67 were specific for regions 9-18 and 52-61, respectively. In the extraction RIA of PTHRP1- 34 we used an affinity gel containing a monoclonal antibody specific for the 17-27 sequence; cross-reacting PTHRP species eluted from the gel were assayed by the RIA of PTHRP1-34. PTHRP1-86 plasma concentrations by IRMA were less than 0.23 pmol/L in control subjects and patients with PH, and were significantly increased in patients with HHM (mean 6.1 pmol/L, P less than 0.001). In contrast, plasma PTHRP1-34 concentrations were not significantly different in the three groups; in HHM patients, the mean was 190 pmol/L. Plasma PTHRP37-67 concentrations were similar in control and PH groups and, although significantly increased in HHM patients (mean 440 pmol/L, P less than 0.002), showed poor diagnostic discrimination. PTHRP1-34 concentrations after affinity extraction of plasma were also significantly higher in HHM patients (mean 10.7 pmol/L, P less than 0.001), but showed incomplete diagnostic discrimination. We conclude that the diagnostic utility of the direct RIAs for quantifying PTHRP is markedly inferior to the IRMA of PTHRP1- 86.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.