Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 37: 497-503, 1991;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Eckfeldt, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Eckfeldt, J. H.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 37, 497-503, Copyright © 1991 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Assessment of split-sample proficiency testing for cholesterol by use of a computer simulation model

ST Bennett, DP Connelly and JH Eckfeldt
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

We developed a computer model to study the use of patients' specimens to assess compliance of cholesterol measurement performance with the 1992 goals of the Laboratory Standardization Panel of the National Cholesterol Education Program. The model uses Monte Carlo techniques to simulate cholesterol measurements that are subject to both systematic and random error. Split-sample measurements by a clinical laboratory and by a reference laboratory are compared by using linear regression to estimate clinical laboratory bias and imprecision; subsequently, according to specified decision limits, the performance of the clinical laboratory is classified as acceptable or deficient. We have quantified the influence of the bias and imprecision of the clinical laboratory, the imprecision of the reference laboratory, the number of split samples compared, and the decision limits on the accuracy of the classification of clinical laboratory performance. Unless the decision limits are carefully selected and a sufficient number of split samples are used, clinical laboratory performance will be frequently misclassified.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.