Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 38: 2468-2471, 1992;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hursting, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Opheim, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hursting, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Opheim, K. E.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 38, 2468-2471, Copyright © 1992 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Measurement of free desipramine in serum by ultrafiltration with immunoassay

MJ Hursting, GD Clark, VA Raisys, SJ Miller and KE Opheim
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

We developed an ultrafiltration method for assaying free desipramine (DMI) in serum. An ultrafiltrate of DMI-containing serum was prepared by centrifugation through an Amicon Centrifree micropartition filter. Syva DMI solid-phase extraction (SPE) columns were used to extract the DMI from the serum and ultrafiltrate. The Syva monoclonal EMIT assay was used to quantify the DMI in the extract. In some experiments, the percent free DMI was quantified with radioactivity. Nonspecific losses of DMI in serum to the ultrafilter system were low (recoveries > 91%). Extraction of [3H]DMI from phosphate-buffered saline (to mimic serum ultrafiltrate) with the Syva SPE system was quantitative (recoveries of 98.4% +/- 4.6%). Free DMI concentrations, derived from serum containing 2.5-2500 micrograms/L DMI, were determined by ultrafiltration; results agreed well with values determined by equilibrium dialysis, the average percent of free DMI being 18.4% +/- 0.25% and 15.9% +/- 0.51%, respectively. To increase the sensitivity of the free DMI assay in the therapeutic range (total DMI 125-300 micrograms/L), we increased fourfold the ultrafiltrate volume applied to the SPE column. For free DMI at 11-130 micrograms/L, the within-run and between-run CVs for the ultrafiltration method were < 9% and < 15%, respectively. Binding of DMI to serum proteins decreased over the pH range 6.0-8.0, although temperatures between 20 and 28 degrees C did not affect binding. The ultrafiltration assay is fast, accurate, simple, and adaptable to standard laboratory instrumentation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.