Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 38: 516-521, 1992;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minder, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Vonderschmitt, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minder, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Vonderschmitt, D. J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 38, 516-521, Copyright © 1992 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Prototype application of a robot in the clinical laboratory enabling fully automated quantification of fecal porphyrins

EI Minder, JP Vuilleumier and DJ Vonderschmitt
Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Unpleasant specimens, sensitive analytes, and a lengthy chromatographic procedure were the main reasons we implemented fecal porphyrin analysis with a laboratory robot. We describe the system in detail and compare it with the same technique performed manually. The day-to-day variation of assays of standards was lower with the robot than with the manual operation: 8% (CV) for coproporphyrin I and 11% for protoporphyrin IX. We repeatedly analyzed a specimen from a healthy volunteer and determined that the specimen contained (in nmol/g dry wt) 7.1 (SD 0.7) for coproporphyrin I, 3.0 (SD 0.4) for coproporphyrin III, and 44.4 (SD 4.3) for protoporphyrin IX. Upper reference limits as measured in 20 healthy volunteers were 20 nmol/g dry wt for coproporphyrin I, 12 nmol/g for coproporphyrin III, and 80 nmol/g for protoporphyrin IX. We also present characteristic chromatograms for samples from various different porphyrias that exhibit abnormal fecal porphyrin excretion. Calculations of return on investment show that the robot, working at full capacity, is a profitable tool.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.