Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 39: 2167-2173, 1993;
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, G. J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 39, 2167-2173, Copyright © 1993 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Chemiluminescent third-generation assay (Amerlite TSH-30) of thyroid- stimulating hormone in serum or plasma assessed

E Wilkinson, PW Rae, KJ Thomson, AD Toft, CA Spencer and GJ Beckett
University Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

We assessed the laboratory performance and clinical utility of a new commercial third-generation assay of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), Amerlite TSH-30. The interassay CV was 6% at TSH concentrations of approximately 0.08 mIU/L, and the analytical and functional detection limits of the assay were 0.005 and 0.0125 mIU/L, respectively. Although the assay recovered approximately 96% of TSH International Reference Preparation (TSH-IRP) 80/558 added to serum samples, the endogenous TSH concentrations in basal samples were significantly lower than those found by using two other TSH assays; bias data obtained from thyroliberin stimulation tests suggested that the negative bias found with TSH-30 may be due to the heterogeneity of TSH in basal samples. TSH-30 completely discriminated hyperthyroid and hypothyroid patients from euthyroid ambulatory patients but also detected TSH (> 0.0125 mIU/L) in 3 of 46 untreated hyperthyroid patients. Compared with two second-generation assays, TSH-30 better discriminated between patients with subnormal TSH due to hyperthyroidism, thyroxine overreplacement, and nonthyroidal illness but there was still significant overlap between results for these groups.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.