Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 39: 896, 1993;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Zuckerman, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Zuckerman, H.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 39, 896-896, Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Medically significant concentrations of prostate-specific antigen in serum assessed

L. H. Bernstein , R. A. Rudolph , M. M. Pinto , N. Viner , and H. Zuckerman

Vol. 36

p. 517. In the article by L.H. Bernstein, R.A. Rudolph, M.M. Pinto, N. Viner, and H. Zuckerman entitled "Medically significant concentrations of prostate-specific antigen in serum assessed," 1990;36:515-8, the text describing Table 4 reports reversed values for sensitivity and positive predictive value and likewise for specificity and negative predictive value. The text should read, "Table 4, a reorganized Table 3, defines the occurrence of binary class patterns with respect to carcinoma of the prostate by stage compared with nondisease. The table allows the estimation of 44.4% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity, a negative predictive value of 79%, and a positive predictive value of 87.8% for PSA >22.8 ng/mL."

Vol. 38

p. 2557. In the latter to the editor by J.D. Mitchell, B.J. Perrigo, and V.A. Mason-Daniel entitled "Falsely negative urine drug assay results due to filtration," 1992;38:2556-7, the units in the first paragraph at the top of p. 2557 should have been micrograms per liter (µg/L), not pg/L.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.