|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 39, 1495-1503, Copyright © 1993 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
G Schectman and E Sasse
Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53211.
Decreasing the large test variability associated with measurements of blood cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)- and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol is likely to improve the classification of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and allow improved monitoring of lipid-lowering treatments. However, improving test precision will benefit the clinician only if (a) the analytical test variability is high relative to the biological test variability and (b) detecting subtle responses to diet or drug therapy is clinically important. Improving HDL- and LDL-cholesterol test precision can be expected to increase the clinical usefulness of these measurements because values for HDL- and LDL-cholesterol correlate closely with CHD risk; are associated with small, yet clinically important, changes in response to diet and (or) drug therapy; and have substantial analytical test variability relative to biological variability. On the other hand, measurements of both blood cholesterol and triglyceride have high biological relative to analytical variability, and do not correlate as closely with CHD risk. Therefore, further improvements in precision for these measurements are less likely to be useful to the clinician.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
F. Magkos, B. W. Patterson, and B. Mittendorfer Reproducibility of stable isotope-labeled tracer measures of VLDL-triglyceride and VLDL-apolipoprotein B-100 kinetics J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 1204 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Magkos, B. W. Patterson, and B. Mittendorfer No effect of menstrual cycle phase on basal very-low-density lipoprotein triglyceride and apolipoprotein B-100 kinetics Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2006; 291(6): E1243 - E1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nauck, G. R. Warnick, and N. Rifai Methods for Measurement of LDL-Cholesterol: A Critical Assessment of Direct Measurement by Homogeneous Assays versus Calculation Clin. Chem., February 1, 2002; 48(2): 236 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lemieux, B. Lamarche, C. Couillard, A. Pascot, B. Cantin, J. Bergeron, G. R. Dagenais, and J.-P. Despres Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio vs LDL Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio as Indices of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk in Men: The Quebec Cardiovascular Study Arch Intern Med, December 10, 2001; 161(22): 2685 - 2692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R C Turner, H Millns, H A W Neil, I M Stratton, S E Manley, D R Matthews, and R R Holman Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS: 23) BMJ, March 14, 1998; 316(7134): 823 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |