Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 39: 1705-1712, 1993;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanc, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by DeLizza, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blanc, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by DeLizza, A. J.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 39, 1705-1712, Copyright © 1993 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Adsorption losses from urine-based cannabinoid calibrators during routine use

JA Blanc, VA Manneh, R Ernst, DE Berger, SA de Keczer, C Chase, JM Centofanti and AJ DeLizza
Development Department, Syva Co., San Jose, CA 95161-9013.

The major metabolite of cannabis found in urine, 11-nor-delta 9- tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (delta 9-THC), is the compound most often used to calibrate cannabinoid immunoassays. The hydrophobic delta 9-THC molecule is known to adsorb to solid surfaces. This loss of analyte from calibrator solutions can lead to inaccuracy in the analytical system. Because the calibrators remain stable when not used, analyte loss is most probably caused by handling techniques. In an effort to develop an effective means of overcoming adsorption losses, we quantified cannabinoid loss from calibrators during the testing process. In studying handling of these solutions, we found noticeable, significant losses attributable to both the kind of pipette used for transfer and the contact surface-to-volume ratio of calibrator solution in the analyzer cup. Losses were quantified by immunoassay and by radioactive tracer. We suggest handling techniques that can minimize adsorption of delta 9-THC to surfaces. Using the appropriate pipette and maintaining a minimum surface-to-volume ratio in the analyzer cup effectively reduces analyte loss.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.