Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 4: 267-270, 1958;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholas, H. O.
Right arrow Articles by Leifeste, H. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholas, H. O.
Right arrow Articles by Leifeste, H. F.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 4, 267-270, Copyright © 1958 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Urinary Calculi

II. Classification of Calculi Found in the Southeast Texas Area

Henry O. Nicholas 1 and H. F. Leifeste 1

1 Departments of Chemistry, The Rice Institute and the Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.

During the course of this investigation we have encountered two "fakes," both of which were represented by the patients to their respective physicians as having been "passed." They showed less than 2 per cent loss on ignition and proved to be calcium-iron-aluminum silicate rocks. We have also had about a dozen prostatic calculi which were analysed by the "ashing" method. This type of calculus consists of either a mixture of magnesium ammonium phosphate and calcium phosphate, or a mixture of calcium carbonate and calcium phosphate. The above-mentioned stones are, of course, not included in this picture. We hope that this survey and the simple method of analysis presented in these two articles will stimulate further work along this line in various parts of the country. The best similar survey we have seen is that of Leonard and Butt (1) on the types of calculi found in the Pensacola, Florida, area.

Submitted on January 17, 1958







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1958 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.