|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 40, 138-144, Copyright © 1994 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
CW Weykamp, TJ Penders, FA Muskiet and W van der Slik
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Queen Beatrix Hospital, Winterswijk, The Netherlands.
One hundred eleven laboratories, using 21 different methods based on five different principles, determined glycohemoglobin (GHb) percentages in two identical series of six lyophilized hemolysates and three similarly processed calibrators, distributed 3 months apart. To assign GHb percentages to calibrators, we used HbA1c results from nine participants who used the Bio-Rad Diamat high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Three-point calibration with assigned values improved mean intralaboratory variation (CV) from 6.6% to 3.5%. For samples with low (5.5%) and high (14.1%) GHb percentages, respectively, calibration decreased interlaboratory variation per method (from 10% to 4% and from 6% to 3%), inter-method variation (from 18% to 4% and from 16% to 3%), and overall interlaboratory variation (from 25% to 7% and from 15% to 4%). Without calibration, 71% of the laboratories did not meet the clinically desirable intralaboratory CV of 3.5%; calibration reduced this proportion to 39%. We conclude that, irrespective of the analytical method used, calibration greatly reduces all sources of GHb variation.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
R. R. Little and C. L. Rohlfing HbA1c Standardization: Background, Progress and Current Issues Lab Med, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 368 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Goldstein, R. R. Little, R. A. Lorenz, J. I. Malone, D. Nathan, C. M. Peterson, and D. B. Sacks Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes Diabetes Care, July 1, 2004; 27(7): 1761 - 1773. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Hoelzel, C. Weykamp, J.-O. Jeppsson, K. Miedema, J. R. Barr, I. Goodall, T. Hoshino, W. G. John, U. Kobold, R. Little, et al. IFCC Reference System for Measurement of Hemoglobin A1c in Human Blood and the National Standardization Schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: A Method-Comparison Study Clin. Chem., January 1, 2004; 50(1): 166 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Sacks, D. E. Bruns, D. E. Goldstein, N. K. Maclaren, J. M. McDonald, and M. Parrott Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus Clin. Chem., March 1, 2002; 48(3): 436 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Little, C. L. Rohlfing, H.-M. Wiedmeyer, G. L. Myers, D. B. Sacks, and D. E. Goldstein The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program: A Five-Year Progress Report Clin. Chem., November 1, 2001; 47(11): 1985 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. B. Roberts, A. B. Amara, M. Morris, and B. N. Green Long-Term Evaluation of Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Glycated Hemoglobin Clin. Chem., February 1, 2001; 47(2): 316 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P.F. Turner, B. Chen, and S. A. Piletsky In Vitro Diagnostics in Diabetes: Meeting the Challenge Clin. Chem., September 1, 1999; 45(9): 1596 - 1601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Rymer, R. Sabatier, A. Daver, J. Bourleaud, M. Assicot, J. Bremond, J. Rapin, S. L. Salhi, B. Thirion, A. Vassault, et al. A New Approach for Clinical Biological Assay Comparison and Standardization: Application of Principal Component Analysis to a Multicenter Study of Twenty-One Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immunoassay Kits Clin. Chem., June 1, 1999; 45(6): 869 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gerlo and F. Gorus Calibration of ion-exchange HPLC measurements of glycohemoglobin: effect on interassay precision Clin. Chem., December 1, 1997; 43(12): 2353 - 2357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Kobold, J.-O. Jeppsson, T. Dulffer, A. Finke, W. Hoelzel, and K. Miedema Candidate reference methods for hemoglobin A1c based on peptide mapping Clin. Chem., October 1, 1997; 43(10): 1944 - 1951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Halwachs-Baumann, S. Katzensteiner, W. Schnedl, P. Purstner, T. Pieber, and M. Wilders-Truschnig Comparative evaluation of three assay systems for automated determination of hemoglobin A1c Clin. Chem., March 1, 1997; 43(3): 511 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |