|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 40, 197-199, Copyright © 1994 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
A Gilfillan, R Axton and DJ Brock
Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, UK.
Two different assay systems were used to detect mutant cystic fibrosis alleles in mouthwash samples from pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. In the first phase of the study, comprising 3110 consecutive samples, we compared the performance of an in-house system and a commercial amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Successful analyses were completed at first attempt in approximately 90% of samples, and the patient resampling rate was 1.1%. There were no false positives and only one detected false negative. In the second phase, comprising 3333 consecutive samples, only ARMS was used. Again, there were no false positives and the patient resampling rate dropped to 0.5%. On the basis of convenience and reduced operator time, we have elected to use ARMS for further screening for cystic fibrosis heterozygotes.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. Houdayer, C. Cazeneuve, E. Cougoureux, C. Magnier, M. Tredano, P. Aymard, M. Goossens, and D. Feldmann Clinical Evaluation of the CF(12)m Cystic Fibrosis DNA Diagnostic Kit Clin. Chem., June 1, 1998; 44(6): 1346 - 1348. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Livingstone, R A Axton, A Gilfillan, M Mennie, M Compton, W A Liston, A A Calder, A J Gordon, and D J H Brock Antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: a trial of the couple model BMJ, June 4, 1994; 308(6942): 1459 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |