Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 40: 487-492, 1994;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doolittle, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Graves, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doolittle, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Graves, S. W.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 40, 487-492, Copyright © 1994 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Unexplained increase in serum digoxin: a case report

MH Doolittle, K Lincoln and SW Graves
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

We describe a patient with unexpectedly high serum digoxin after cardiac surgery. To control atrial fibrillation in the immediate postoperative period, she was given a brief trial of digoxin (four 0.25- mg doses) over 12 h. Serum digoxin 6 h later was 2.5 micrograms/L. Two days later, the patient developed ventricular fibrillation, which progressed to cardiac arrest. During or immediately after resuscitation, blood was drawn for a digoxin measurement, and the concentration reported was 9.3 micrograms/L; this result was verified by repeated analysis. Digoxin decreased rapidly and progressively to near 4.0 micrograms/L over the next several hours and thereafter decreased slowly to 1.0 microgram/L over the next 11 days, despite no digoxin being administered. The unexpectedly high digoxin raised questions about the accuracy of the digoxin measurement, particularly about the possible influence of the digoxin-like immunoreactive factor. Analytical approaches to distinguishing true digoxin from this factor and other artifacts of digoxin measurement were applied to this patient, with unanticipated results.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.