Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 40: 723-728, 1994;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenny, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenny, R. W.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 40, 723-728, Copyright © 1994 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Process capability and stability of analytical systems assessed from proficiency testing data

RW Jenny
New York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, Albany 12201-0509.

Participation in a proficiency testing (PT) program is a valuable adjunct to laboratory activities dedicated to the maintenance of reliable analytical methods. The PT program may facilitate continuous quality improvement if laboratory performance is presented in the context of expectations espoused by healthcare professionals for optimal patient care. Statistical process control (SPC) and capability analysis are tools used by industry in a Total Quality Management environment to characterize and monitor the performance of its processes relative to performance specifications. I conceptualized the use of an analytical system by many laboratories as a process that periodically produces results from the analysis of PT specimens. I treated a set of five PT results (theophylline) reported by a laboratory as a process sample and subjected the samples collected from many laboratories to SPC and capability analysis. The control charts-- mean-(X-bar) and s-charts--produced by the analysis readily identify significant analytical errors in the context of peer performance and performance specifications provided by the regulatory program and analytical goal setting. The capability index (desirable Cp > 1.0) determined from clinical specification limits for the three analytical systems evaluated suggests an opportunity for improvement of laboratory performance.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
R. W. Jenny and K. Y. Jackson-Tarentino
Causes of Unsatisfactory Performance in Proficiency Testing
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2000; 46(1): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.