Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 41: 306-311, 1995;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stott, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Landt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stott, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Landt, M.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 41, 306-311, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Analytical artifacts in hematocrit measurements by whole-blood chemistry analyzers

RA Stott, GL Hortin, TR Wilhite, SB Miller, CH Smith and M Landt
Department of Pathology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, MO 63110.

Compact analyzers suited to near-patient testing estimate hematocrit by measuring the conductivity of undiluted blood. We evaluated the accuracy of hematocrit determination of one such analyzer (Instrumentation Laboratory BGE analyzer) against an automated cell counter (EPC) and packed cell volume (PCV) microhematocrit. When specimens (n = 34) from outpatient and ward patients were analyzed with all three methods, the BGE analyzer correlated well with both EPC and PCV hematocrit determinations (BGE = 1.00 PCV + 0.3%, S(y)/x = 2.0%), suggesting that all three methods are similar in performance for most patients. However, a patient with increased plasma osmolality showed significant decreases in BGE and PCV hematocrits relative to the EPC method. The differences in hematocrit measurements could be reproduced by adding solutes to blood in vitro or by modifying the plasma osmolality of rats in vivo. Samples from patients undergoing cardiac surgery, whose blood had large changes in protein concentration, showed discrepancies between hematocrits by conductivity and other methods; similar effects could be produced by changes in protein concentration or in vitro addition of polyethylene glycol. We conclude that conductivity measurements provide accurate hematocrit results for physiologically normal subjects but not for some intensive-care and surgical patients.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
J Steinfelder-Visscher, P W Weerwind, S Teerenstra, and M H. Brouwer
Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 33 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Lindemans, P. Hoefkens, A. L. van Kessel, M. Bonnay, W. R. Kulpmann, and J. D.E. van Suijlen
Portable Blood Gas and Electrolyte Analyzer Evaluated in a Multiinstitutional Study
Clin. Chem., January 1, 1999; 45(1): 111 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.