Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 41: 553-556, 1995;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thonnard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Philippe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thonnard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Philippe, M.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 41, 553-556, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

HLA class II genotyping: two assay systems compared

J Thonnard, F Deldime, M Heusterspreute, B Delepaut, F Hanon, M De Bruyere and M Philippe
Clinical Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Louvain University Medical School, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

In the last few years, a variety of DNA-based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing methods have emerged, revealing the extreme polymorphism of HLA genes. This polymorphism makes it difficult for a clinical laboratory to establish the best HLA typing strategy. In this study we have compared two techniques for performing HLA-DRB typing: a commercial rapid assay based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by reverse dot-blot hybridization of the PCR products (the Inno-LiPA assay), and a method based on PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. We found that both methods provide reliable results with a high rate of concordance (97%) and that Inno-LiPA is convenient for large-scale routine typing. However, if a high-resolution allelic typing is required, each method lacks accuracy but using them in association improves the accuracy of the results.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
I A Hoppenbrouwers, L. P. Cortes, Y S Aulchenko, K Sintnicolaas, O Njajou, P J. Snijders, B A Oostra, C M van Duijn, and R Q Hintzen
Familial clustering of multiple sclerosis in a Dutch genetic isolate
Multiple Sclerosis, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 17 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
M. C Bartels, H. G Otten, B E. van Gelderen, and A. Van der Lelij
Influence of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR matching on rejection of random corneal grafts using corneal tissue for retrospective DNA HLA typing
Br J Ophthalmol, November 1, 2001; 85(11): 1341 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.