|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 41, 553-556, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
J Thonnard, F Deldime, M Heusterspreute, B Delepaut, F Hanon, M De Bruyere and M Philippe
Clinical Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Louvain University Medical School, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
In the last few years, a variety of DNA-based human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing methods have emerged, revealing the extreme polymorphism of HLA genes. This polymorphism makes it difficult for a clinical laboratory to establish the best HLA typing strategy. In this study we have compared two techniques for performing HLA-DRB typing: a commercial rapid assay based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by reverse dot-blot hybridization of the PCR products (the Inno-LiPA assay), and a method based on PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. We found that both methods provide reliable results with a high rate of concordance (97%) and that Inno-LiPA is convenient for large-scale routine typing. However, if a high-resolution allelic typing is required, each method lacks accuracy but using them in association improves the accuracy of the results.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
I A Hoppenbrouwers, L. P. Cortes, Y S Aulchenko, K Sintnicolaas, O Njajou, P J. Snijders, B A Oostra, C M van Duijn, and R Q Hintzen Familial clustering of multiple sclerosis in a Dutch genetic isolate Multiple Sclerosis, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 17 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C Bartels, H. G Otten, B E. van Gelderen, and A. Van der Lelij Influence of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR matching on rejection of random corneal grafts using corneal tissue for retrospective DNA HLA typing Br J Ophthalmol, November 1, 2001; 85(11): 1341 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |