Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 42: 1955-1960, 1996;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delage, V.
Right arrow Articles by Saez, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delage, V.
Right arrow Articles by Saez, S.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 42, 1955-1960, Copyright © 1996 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Microtiter plate immunoenzymometric assay for estrogen receptor

V Delage, JM Teulon, L Bellanger, P Seguin, F Descotes and S Saez
CIS Bio International, Division In Vitro Technologies, Bagnols-sur- Ceze, France.

The estrogen receptor (ER) status of breast cancer is used both as a prognostic factor and as a predictor of response to endocrine therapy. An immunoenzymometric assay for ER was developed on 96-well microtiter plates (EIA96). This technique involves two monoclonal antibodies directed against different epitopes in the B domain of ER. The two-step protocol (16-18 h and 3 h at 4 degrees C) requires 100 microL of cytosol. This assay showed a detection limit of 0.58 pmol/L. Intra- and interassay CVs of clinical specimens were < or = 5% except for the least concentrated sample (6.5 pmol/L, CV = 6.7%). In a comparison study involving cytosols of breast adenocarcinoma tissue biopsies, we compared the EIA96 with the radioligand assay (RLA) and the Abbott ER- EIA, widely used techniques for determining ER concentration in cytosols of breast cancer tumors. The two EIAs showed excellent agreement; however, two samples showed discrepant results by EIA96 and RLA.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.