Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 42: 613-617, 1996;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, J. B.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 42, 613-617, Copyright © 1996 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Use of neural networks to diagnose acute myocardial infarction. II. A clinical application

SM Pedersen, JS Jorgensen and JB Pedersen
Klinisk Kemisk Afdeling, Svendborg Sygehus, Denmark.

We investigated the ability of neural networks to diagnose acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from laboratory data only. Several networks were trained with different combinations of data obtained at admission and within the first 12 h and 24 h after admission. The data used included the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the concentrations in serum of potassium, creatine kinase B-subunit (CKB), and lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 for 250 patients with suspected AMI. Based on admission data, the correct diagnosis was predicted for 76% of the patients in the test group from the ECG data only, and the best combination of ECG results with other variables yielded correct diagnoses for 85% of the test group. Using all of the data available within 24 h, the network predicted the correct diagnosis for 99% of the test data. Almost the same high predictability was obtained by using only two CKB values- recorded at admission and within 12 h after admission-or by using just the latter one. Neural networks and quadratic discriminant analysis performed similarly, but the neural networks were more robust for combinations with many laboratory data.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Ellenius, T. Groth, B. Lindahl, and L. Wallentin
Early assessment of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction by biochemical monitoring and neural network analysis
Clin. Chem., October 1, 1997; 43(10): 1919 - 1925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.