Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 42: 732-737, 1996;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schectman, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sasse, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schectman, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sasse, E. A.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 42, 732-737, Copyright © 1996 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Variability in cholesterol measurements: comparison of calculated and direct LDL cholesterol determinations

G Schectman, M Patsches and EA Sasse
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53221, USA.gschect@post.its.mcw.edu

Calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations determined from the Friedewald equation have a large intraindividual CV, in part because the calculation incorporates the variability of cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride measurements. We studied whether a new assay that measures LDL-C directly will reduce this variability and reduce the need for averaging serial specimens. Four blood samples were obtained 1 week apart from 35 mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects and analyzed for total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-C. LDL-C was calculated by the Friedewald equation, and was also measured directly with a commercially available direct LDL-C assay. The intraindividual CV for the direct and calculated LDL-C assays were similar [CV of direct LDL-C assay (mean +/- SE): 6.8 +/- 0.5% vs calculated LDL-C: 7.3 +/- 0.6%; difference 0.44%, 95% confidence interval: -0.7-1.5%]. For both assays, at least two blood tests were required from each subject to reduce total variability of LDL-C to less than or equal to 5%. We conclude that the direct LDL-C assay did not reduce the variability in LDL-C compared with the conventional LDL-C calculation. However, it may have a specific role in lipid disorder evaluation and (or) monitoring when triglycerides are increased or the LDL-C value alone is needed.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. S. Orr, A. L. Dengo, J. M. Rivero, and K. P. Davy
Arterial Destiffening With Atorvastatin in Overweight and Obese Middle-Aged and Older Adults
Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 763 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
K. Cianflone, R. Zakarian, C. Couillard, B. Delplanque, J.-P. Despres, and A. Sniderman
Fasting acylation-stimulating protein is predictive of postprandial triglyceride clearance
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2004; 45(1): 124 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Faraj, P. J. Havel, S. Phelis, D. Blank, A. D. Sniderman, and K. Cianflone
Plasma Acylation-Stimulating Protein, Adiponectin, Leptin, and Ghrelin before and after Weight Loss Induced by Gastric Bypass Surgery in Morbidly Obese Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 1594 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. Faraj, P. Jones, A. D. Sniderman, and K. Cianflone
Enhanced dietary fat clearance in postobese women
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2001; 42(4): 571 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. Gomez, J. Camps, J. M. Simo, N. Ferre, and J. Joven
Agreement Study of Methods Based on the Elimination Principle for the Measurement of LDL- and HDL-Cholesterol Compared with Ultracentrifugation in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2000; 46(8): 1188 - 1191.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Benlian, C. Cansier, G. Hennache, O. Khallouf, P. Bayer, F. Duron, F. Carrat, R. Couderc, O. Chazouilleres, J. Bardet, et al.
Comparison of a New Method for the Direct and Simultaneous Assessment of LDL- and HDL-Cholesterol with Ultracentrifugation and Established Methods
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2000; 46(4): 493 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
T. Planella, M. Cortes, C. Martinez-Bru, F. Gonzalez-Sastre, and J. Ordonez-Llanos
Calculation of LDL-cholesterol by using apolipoprotein B for classification of nonchylomicronemic dyslipemia
Clin. Chem., May 1, 1997; 43(5): 808 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.