Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 42: 1182-1188, 1996;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rifai, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rifai, N.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 42, 1182-1188, Copyright © 1996 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Analytical performance and clinical utility of a direct LDL-cholesterol assay in a hyperlipidemic pediatric population

N Harris, EJ Neufeld, JW Newburger, B Ticho, A Baker, GS Ginsburg, E Rimm and N Rifai
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

This study compares a new latex immunoseparation method for the direct determination of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with the reference procedure for LDL-C (beta-quantification) in a pediatric hyperlipidemic population. The direct LDL-C assay has a mean bias of -98 mg/L in a fasting group (n = 96) of patients (mean triglycerides 1057 +/- 720 mg/L) and a bias of +177 mg/L in a nonfasting group (n = 42, mean triglycerides 4854 +/- 5457 mg/L). The mean total analytical error calculated from our data is 13.8%. The direct LDL-C assay and the commonly used Friedewald calculation respectively classified 81% and 84% of fasting patients correctly, according to the cutoffs of 1100 and 1300 mg/L for LDL-C set by the National Cholesterol Education Program for pediatric patients. Of combined fasting and nonfasting patients, 80% were correctly classified by the direct LDL-C assay. Therefore, despite several analytical shortcomings, the direct LDL-C assay may be useful in managing hyperlipidemic children without the need for a fasting specimen.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. M. Haney, L. H. Huffman, C. Bougatsos, M. Freeman, R. D. Steiner, and H. D. Nelson
Screening and Treatment for Lipid Disorders in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Pediatrics, July 1, 2007; 120(1): e189 - e214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Nauck, G. R. Warnick, and N. Rifai
Methods for Measurement of LDL-Cholesterol: A Critical Assessment of Direct Measurement by Homogeneous Assays versus Calculation
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2002; 48(2): 236 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Esteban-Salan, A. Guimon-Bardesi, J. M. de la Viuda-Unzueta, M. N. Azcarate-Ania, P. Pascual-Usandizaga, and E. Amoroto-Del-Rio
Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of Two Homogeneous Assays for LDL-Cholesterol in Hyperlipidemic Patients
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2000; 46(8): 1121 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. Gomez, J. Camps, J. M. Simo, N. Ferre, and J. Joven
Agreement Study of Methods Based on the Elimination Principle for the Measurement of LDL- and HDL-Cholesterol Compared with Ultracentrifugation in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2000; 46(8): 1188 - 1191.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. S. Ticho, E. J. Neufeld, J. W. Newburger, N. Harris, A. Baker, and N. Rifai
Utility of Direct Measurement of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Dyslipidemic Pediatric Patients
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 1998; 152(8): 787 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
N. Rifai, T. G. Cole, E. Iannotti, T. Law, M. Macke, R. Miller, D. Dowd, and D. A. Wiebe
Assessment of interlaboratory performance in external proficiency testing programs with a direct HDL-cholesterol assay
Clin. Chem., July 1, 1998; 44(7): 1452 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
N. Rifai, E. Iannotti, K. DeAngelis, and T. Law
Analytical and clinical performance of a homogeneous enzymatic LDL-cholesterol assay compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg2+ method
Clin. Chem., June 1, 1998; 44(6): 1242 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.