HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pardue, H. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pardue, H. L. Related Collections Laboratory Management Automation and Analytical Techniques

Counterpoint The inseparable triad: analytical sensitivity, measurement uncertainty, and quantitative resolution

The formal definition of sensitivity associates the term with the change in the response of a system for a small change of the stimulus causing the response, i.e., the ratio of the response of a system to the stimulus causing it. One interpretation of sensitivity associates the rate of change of the response for a small change of the stimulus as the slope of a calibration plot of response vs stimulus. An alternative interpretation associates sensitivity with the smallest value of the stimulus that can be resolved with a given degree of confidence, i.e., the detection limit. Applications of the first usage to analytical chemistry date at least to the beginning of this century; applications of the second interpretation are of more recent origin. The accompanying paper argues in favor of the second interpretation on the basis that, among other things, the "slope" interpretation conflicts with the formal definition of sensitivity and is meaningless as a descriptor of the performance of a measuring system. In this paper I offer arguments to support my belief that the slope definition of sensitivity is consistent with both formal definitions and accepted usage in analytical chemistry and, more importantly, that it is an invaluable descriptor of one of the most important characteristics of any analytical method. I include information to support my belief that proper use of the slope definition yields much more information than is available in the "detection limit" interpretation.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				A. Halperin, A. Buhot, and E.B. Zhulina Sensitivity, Specificity, and the Hybridization Isotherms of DNA Chips Biophys. J., February 1, 2004; 86(2): 718 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Giuliani, J.-P. Bertinchant, C. Granier, M. Laprade, S. Chocron, G. Toubin, J.-P. Etievent, C. Larue, and S. Trinquier Determination of Cardiac Troponin I Forms in the Blood of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Patients Receiving Crystalloid or Cold Blood Cardioplegia Clin. Chem., February 1, 1999; 45(2): 213 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Ekins Ligand assays: from electrophoresis to miniaturized microarrays Clin. Chem., September 1, 1998; 44(9): 2015 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. L. Pardue Dr. Pardue responds: Clin. Chem., August 1, 1998; 44(8): 1776 - 1778. [Full Text]

				R. Ekins and P. Edwards On the Meaning of ""Sensitivity"": A Rejoinder Clin. Chem., August 1, 1998; 44(8): 1773 - 1776. [Full Text]