Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 43: 1926-1931, 1997;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, M.
Right arrow Articles by Filtenborg, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, M.
Right arrow Articles by Filtenborg, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
(Clinical Chemistry. 1997;43:1926-1931.)
© 1997 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Quality assessment of blood glucose testing in general practitioners' offices improves quality

Marta Stahl1,a, Ivan Brandslund1, Steffen Iversen2 and Jens Anton Filtenborg3

1 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Vejle County Central Hospital, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark.
2 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Fredericia Hospital, 7000 Fredericia, Denmark.
3 General practice, 6000 Kolding, Denmark.
a Author for correspondence. Fax + 45 75 82 18 14; e-mail bbo1497{at}vip.cybercity.dk

Measurement of blood glucose is a frequent test in Danish physicians' offices. We describe here a new design of external quality assessment wherein fresh, unstabilized whole-blood samples were analyzed by the physicians' office methods and by a hospital laboratory comparison method (glucose dehydrogenase assay, calibrated against NIST 909a). This approach was used in the offices of 171 general practitioners in our county during a 5-year period. The first survey, in 1992, revealed unsatisfactory performance in terms of our criterion that no difference between the physician's office and the hospital laboratory's single result should exceed ±20% of the laboratory result. After initiation of a program of consultation and assistance, the proficiency testing rounds of 1994 and 1996 showed considerable improvement. Thus, whereas in 1992 12% of the values were outside the acceptance limits, in 1994 and 1996 the respective values were 4% and 3%. We believe the effect was mainly related to improvements in choice of technology, procedures, and handling of specimens. We conclude that the use of bedside instruments should be restricted to diagnosis of only severe hypo- or hyperglycemia and to monitoring glucose >5 mmol/L in already diagnosed diabetics. Our program differs from previous approaches to quality assessment and could also be useful for large hospitals' in-house proficiency testing.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Haeckel, U. Brinck, D. Colic, H.-U. Janka, I. Puntmann, J. Schneider, and C. Viebrock
Comparability of Blood Glucose Concentrations Measured in Different Sample Systems for Detecting Glucose Intolerance
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2002; 48(6): 936 - 939.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. du Plessis, J. B. Ubbink, and W.J. H. Vermaak
Analytical Quality of Near-Patient Blood Cholesterol and Glucose Determinations
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2000; 46(8): 1085 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
B. C Delaney, C. J Hyde, R. J McManus, S. Wilson, D. A Fitzmaurice, S. Jowett, R. Tobias, G. H Thorpe, and F D R. Hobbs
Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary care
BMJ, September 25, 1999; 319(7213): 824 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.