|
|
||||||||
Articles |
General Medicine/Geriatrics Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642.
Address for correspondence: Box MED, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642. Fax 716-273-1069; e-mail Edgar_Black{at}medicine.rochester.edu
As clinicians evaluate patients, they first develop problem lists based on the history, physical examination, and basic laboratory studies. Synthesis and analysis result in a differential diagnosis with associated disease probabilities. Experienced clinicians then selectively use diagnostic tests to rule in or rule out these possibilities. For example, in a patient presenting with jaundice, anorexia, fever, and abdominal pain, the relative increases of the serum aminotransferase activity and the serum alkaline phosphatase will help to guide the subsequent evaluation. If the aminotransferase activity is markedly increased, then the subsequent evaluation will be targeted toward identifying an etiology for hepatocellular injury. In contrast, if the alkaline phosphatase is markedly increased, then the evaluation would be targeted toward identifying an etiology for obstructive jaundice. This paper reviews clinical decision making, discusses characteristics of diagnostic tests, and presents examples of how basic clinical information can guide the use of the laboratory in evaluating patients with suspected liver disease.
Key Words: indexing terms: sensitivity specificity predictive value
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
J. M. Rothschild, R. Khorasani, S. G. Silverman, R. W. Hanson, J. M. Fiskio, and D. W. Bates Abdominal Cross-sectional Imaging for Inpatients With Abnormal Liver Function Test Results: Yield and Usefulness Arch Intern Med, February 26, 2001; 161(4): 583 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |