|
|
||||||||
Laboratory Management |
1
Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program, 250 Bloor St. East, Suite 501, Toronto, ON, Canada M4W 1E6.
2
Department of Biochemistry, University of Western
Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
3
Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Credit Valley
Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
4
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sunnybrook Health
Science Centre, North York, ON, Canada.
5
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of
Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
6
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Hamilton General
Campus, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
7
Department of Pathology, McMaster University, Hamilton,
ON, Canada.
8
Analyzer types and manufacturers are: aca, Dimension, Paramax, and Stratus systems (Dade International); Access (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur); ACS 180 (Chiron); Beckman CX systems (Beckman Instruments); Cobas Mira systems (Roche Diagnostic Systems); Hitachi systems (Boehringer Mannheim); ICON (Hybritech); RA systems and Immuno I (Bayer Corp.); Spectrum, IMx, and AxSYM (Abbott Labs.); Vitros DT, 250, 500, and 700 (Johnson and Johnson Clinical Diagnostics).
9
LPTP requires that proficiency testing challenges are processed as patient specimens. Accordingly, outliers reported in these surveys have not been subjected to statistical trimming.
a Address correspondence to this author at: 19 Linksgate Rd., London, ON, Canada N6G 2A6. E-mail ahenders{at}julian.uwo.ca.
The Ontario Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program has regularly
monitored the analytical performance of total creatine kinase (CK)
(
230 participants) and CK isoenzyme-2 (CK-MB) (
160 participants)
throughout the entire province. Consistently, a wide dispersion of
results has been observed not only between different analyzer systems
but also among identical analyzers. Accordingly, the results of the
last three proficiency surveys for these analytes were examined
statistically to establish both the extent of these variations and the
range of values reported for the male upper reference ranges. The
results of many of the analyzer systems were significantly different
from each other, as were many of the reference ranges. This
unsatisfactory situation may only be remedied by the use of reference
materials as shown by others. The consequences of these findings also
effect the reliability of epidemiological surveys such as the WHO
MONICA Project (Circulation 1994;90:583612), which
monitors deaths due to heart disease and includes cardiac enzyme
results in its criteria.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
A. Halkin, G. W. Stone, C. L. Grines, D. A. Cox, B. D. Rutherford, P. Esente, C. M. Meils, P. Albertsson, A. Farah, J. E. Tcheng, et al. Prognostic Implications of Creatine Kinase Elevation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 7, 2006; 47(5): 951 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Christenson, H. Vaidya, Y. Landt, R. S. Bauer, S. F. Green, F. A. Apple, A. Jacob, G. R. Magneson, S. Nag, A. H.B. Wu, et al. Standardization of Creatine Kinase-MB (CK-MB) Mass Assays: The Use of Recombinant CK-MB as a Reference Material Clin. Chem., September 1, 1999; 45(9): 1414 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |