|
|
||||||||
Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics |
Departments of
1
Clinical Biochemistry,
2
Gastroenterology,
3
Radiology,
4
Pathology, and
5
Surgery, and
6
Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Antoni M. Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 34-3-2919196; e-mail lig{at}santpau.es.
Detection of K-ras mutations may be useful in the evaluation of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to assess, in a prospective design, the diagnostic utility of K-ras mutation analysis in 62 consecutive fine-needle aspirates of pancreatic masses, using two PCR-based techniquesstandard and enrichedwith detection limits of a mutant allele in the presence of 102 or 103 wild-type alleles, respectively. Cytology alone offered a diagnostic sensitivity of 75%. The enriched higher sensitivity detection technique, in combination with cytology, offered a diagnostic sensitivity of 91% without false positives. The molecular analysis would have contributed to diagnosis in an additional 14 cases of pancreatic cancer. The standard technique contributed to diagnosis in an additional 9 cases. These results strongly support the use of the enriched method of detecting K-ras mutations as a complement to cytology in the evaluation of pancreatic masses.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
J. Mora, E. Urgell, A. Farre, L. Comas, E. Montserrat, and F. Gonzalez-Sastre Agreement between K-ras Sequence Variations Detected in Plasma and Tissue DNA in Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Chem., July 1, 2006; 52(7): 1448 - 1449. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.A. TUVESON and S.R. HINGORANI Ductal Pancreatic Cancer in Humans and Mice Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2005; 70(0): 65 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Esteller, S. Gonzalez, R. A. Risques, E. Marcuello, R. Mangues, J. R. Germa, J. G. Herman, G. Capella, and M. A. Peinado K-ras and p16 Aberrations Confer Poor Prognosis in Human Colorectal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2001; 19(2): 299 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |