|
|
||||||||
General Clinical Chemistry |
1
Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Departments of Clinical Chemistry and
2
Nephrology, F1217, P.O. Box 22700, Amsterdam, 1100 DE, The Netherlands.
3
The work reported here was performed by Renata
Sanders, Marjolein G. Klous, Henk J. Huijgen, Rudolf W. van Olden, and
Gerard T.B. Sanders, with grateful appreciation for the technical
assistance of Ron Hoebe and Carel van Oven of the Department of
Radiobiology of the University of Amsterdam. Address correspondence
about the Appendix to R.S. Fax 31-20-5664440.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 31-20-5664440; e-mail h.huijgen{at}amc.uva.nl.
To establish the best measure for determining magnesium overload, we measured ionized and total magnesium in serum and mononuclear blood cells and total magnesium in erythrocytes in blood of 23 hemodialysis patients, known for their disturbed magnesium homeostasis. When comparing the mean magnesium values obtained in the patient population with those of a control population, all of these magnesium markers, including the biologically active fractions, were significantly (P <0.05) increased. Because serum total magnesium was not increased in all dialysis patients studied, the population was divided into two groups, according to total serum magnesium >1.0 mmol/L or less than that. Results in these two populations showed that ionized serum magnesium and ionized magnesium in mononuclear blood cells might give a better indication about the magnesium status of the tested patients than the currently used total serum magnesium data. However, neither of the two markers, especially ionized serum magnesium, was able to discriminate fully between normal magnesium homeostasis and magnesium excess. We therefore conclude that the two ionized magnesium markers offer minimal advantage for this discrimination, and that the total magnesium concentration in serum remains the measurement of choice.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |