Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 44: 779-789, 1998;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cobbaert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nauck, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cobbaert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nauck, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
(Clinical Chemistry. 1998;44:779-789.)
© 1998 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Lipids and Lipoproteins

Reference standardization and triglyceride interference of a new homogeneous HDL-cholesterol assay compared with a former chemical precipitation assay

Christa Cobbaert1,a, Louwerens Zwang1, Ferruccio Ceriotti2, Annalisa Modenese2, Peter Cremer3, Wolfgang Herrmann4, Gerhard Hoss5, Jochen Jarausch5, Regina Türk5, Winfried März6, and Matthias Nauck6

1 Academic Hospital Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

2 Istituto Scientifico H.S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

3 Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.

4 Klinikum der Universität des Saarlandes, Hamburg, Germany.

5 Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

6 Klinikum der Universität, Freiburg, Germany.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Lipid Reference Laboratory, Academic Hospital Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Fax 31-10 436 7894; e-mail: boersma{at}ckcl.azr.nl.

A homogeneous HDL-c assay (HDL-H), which uses polyethylene glycol-modified enzymes and sulfated {alpha}-cyclodextrin, was assessed for precision, accuracy, and cholesterol and triglyceride interference. In addition, its analytical performance was compared with that of a phosphotungstic acid (PTA)/MgCl2 precipitation method (HDL-P). Within-run CVs were <=1.87%; total CVs were <=3.08%. Accuracy was evaluated in fresh normotriglyceridemic sera using the Designated Comparison Method (HDL-H = 1.037 Designated Comparison Method + 4 mg/L; n = 63) and in moderately hypertriglyceridemic sera by using the Reference Method (HDL-H = 1.068 Reference Method - 17 mg/L; n = 41). Mean biases were 4.5% and 2.2%, respectively. In hypertriglyceridemic sera (n = 85), HDL-H concentrations were increasingly positively biased with increasing triglyceride concentrations. The method comparison between HDL-H and HDL-P yielded the following equation: HDL-H = 1.037 HDL-P + 15 mg/L; n = 478. We conclude that HDL-H amply meets the 1998 NCEP recommendations for total error; its precision is superior compared with that of HDL-P, and its average bias remains below ±5% as long as triglyceride concentrations are <=10 g/L and in case of moderate hypercholesterolemia.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
IOVSHome page
W. E. Connor, P. B. Duell, R. Kean, and Y. Wang
The Prime Role of HDL to Transport Lutein into the Retina: Evidence from HDL-Deficient WHAM Chicks Having a Mutant ABCA1 Transporter
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 4226 - 4231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. R. Warnick, M. Nauck, and N. Rifai
Evolution of Methods for Measurement of HDL-Cholesterol: From Ultracentrifugation to Homogeneous Assays
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2001; 47(9): 1579 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. M. Wagner, J. L. Sanchez-Quesada, A. Perez, M. Rigla, M. Cortes, F. Blanco-Vaca, and J. Ordonez-Llanos
Inaccuracy of Calculated LDL-Cholesterol in Type 2 Diabetes: Consequences for Patient Risk Classification and Therapeutic Decisions
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2000; 46(11): 1830 - 1832.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. M. Kimberly, E. T. Leary, T. G. Cole, and P. P. Waymack
Selection, Validation, Standardization, and Performance of a Designated Comparison Method for HDL-Cholesterol for Use in the Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network
Clin. Chem., October 1, 1999; 45(10): 1803 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. Cobbaert, P. G.H. Mulder, H. Baadenhuijsen, L. Zwang, C. W. Weykamp, and P. N.M. Demacker
Survey of Total Error of Precipitation and Homogeneous HDL-Cholesterol Methods and Simultaneous Evaluation of Lyophilized Saccharose-containing Candidate Reference Materials for HDL-Cholesterol
Clin. Chem., March 1, 1999; 45(3): 360 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
K. J. Lackner and G. Schmitz
ß-VLDL of Patients with Type III Hyperlipoproteinemia Interferes with Homogeneous Determination of HDL-Cholesterol Based on Polyethylene Glycol-modified Enzymes
Clin. Chem., December 1, 1998; 44(12): 2546 - 2548.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.