|
|
||||||||
NACB Symposium |
1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, KY 40292.
2
Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Medical
School, Chicago, IL 60611.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 502-852-1771; e-mail r0vald01{at}homer.louisville.edu.
In this Standard of Laboratory Practice we recommend guidelines for
therapeutic monitoring of cardiac drugs. Cardiac drugs are primarily
used for treatment of angina, arrhythmias, and congestive heart
failure. Digoxin, used in congestive heart failure, is widely
prescribed and therapeutically monitored. Monitoring and use of
antiarrhythmics such as disopyramide and lidocaine have been steadily
declining. Immunoassay techniques are currently the most popular
methods for measuring cardiac drugs. Several reasons make measurement
of cardiac drugs in serum important: their narrow therapeutic index,
similarity in clinical complications and presentation of under- and
overmedicated patients, need for dosage adjustments, and confirmation
of patient compliance. Monitoring may also be necessary in other
circumstances, such as assessment of acetylator phenotypes. We present
recommendations for measuring digoxin, quinidine, procainamide (and
N-acetylprocainamide), lidocaine, and flecainide. We
discuss guidelines for measuring unbound digoxin in the presence of an
antidote (Fab fragments), for characterizing the impact of digoxin-like
immunoreactive factor (DLIF) and other cross-reactants on immunoassays,
and for monitoring the unbound (free fraction) of drugs that bind to
1-acid glycoprotein. We also discuss logistic, clinical,
hospital, and laboratory practice guidelines needed for implementation
of a successful therapeutic drug monitoring service for cardiac
drugs.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
W S A Smellie, J Forth, S Sundar, E Kalu, C A M McNulty, E Sherriff, I D Watson, C Croucher, T M Reynolds, and P J Carey Best practice in primary care pathology: review 4 J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2006; 59(9): 893 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gheorghiade, K. F. Adams Jr, and W. S. Colucci Digoxin in the Management of Cardiovascular Disorders Circulation, June 22, 2004; 109(24): 2959 - 2964. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Steimer, C. Muller, and B. Eber Digoxin Assays: Frequent, Substantial, and Potentially Dangerous Interference by Spironolactone, Canrenone, and Other Steroids Clin. Chem., March 1, 2002; 48(3): 507 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rainey, I. T. Ocal, and T. R. Green Digibind and Free Digoxin • The authors of the article cited above respond: Clin. Chem., May 1, 1999; 45(5): 719 - 721. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Valdes Jr. and S. A. Jortani Monitoring of Unbound Digoxin in Patients Treated with Anti-Digoxin Antigen-binding Fragments: A Model for the Future? Clin. Chem., September 1, 1998; 44(9): 1883 - 1885. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |