|
|
||||||||
Test Utilization and Outcomes |
1
Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233-7331.
2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
30341-3724.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, P230 West Pavilion, 619 South 19th Street, Birmingham, AL 35233-7331.
We compared centralized vs distributed methods for delivering "stat" test results for blood gas, glucose, and electrolyte assays. The parameters for comparison were as follows: (a) laboratory turnaround time (TAT), (b) therapeutic TAT, and (c) staff satisfaction. Therapeutic TAT, defined as the time from the initiating order to the receipt of the result and the implementation of any indicated change in treatment, was obtained by direct observation of testing procedures at the bedside and timing each step in the process. Observing therapeutic TAT yields information on the impact of laboratory testing methods in the context of clinical decision making. Therapeutic TAT was 12 min shorter for bedside testing compared with a satellite laboratory and 914 min shorter in the satellite laboratory compared with centralized testing. Satellite laboratories received the highest staff satisfaction scores, followed by bedside testing, with the central laboratory receiving the lowest scores.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
S. Shahangian and S. R. Snyder Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators: A Review of the Literature Am J Clin Pathol, March 1, 2009; 131(3): 418 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Chung, W. Lee, S. Chun, H.-I. Park, and W.-K. Min Analysis of Turnaround Time by Subdividing Three Phases for Outpatient Chemistry Specimens Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2009; 39(2): 144 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Sanehi, U. R. Jahn, and H. Van Aken Near-patient testing Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 608 - 608. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. R. Jahn and H. Van Aken Editorial I: Near-patient testing--point-of-care or point of costs and convenience? Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2003; 90(4): 425 - 427. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Scott Faster Is Better--It’s Rarely That Simple! Clin. Chem., April 1, 2000; 46(4): 441 - 442. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Rainey Outcomes Assessment for Point-of-Care Testing Clin. Chem., August 1, 1998; 44(8): 1595 - 1596. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |