Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 45: 118-122, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langlois, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by De Buyzere, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langlois, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by De Buyzere, M. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:118-122.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Automated Flow Cytometry Compared with an Automated Dipstick Reader for Urinalysis

Michel R. Langlois1, Joris R. Delanghe1,a, Sophia R. Steyaert1, Karel C. Everaert2 and Marc L. De Buyzere1

Departments of
1 Clinical Chemistry and
2 Urology, University Hospital Gent, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 32-9-2404985; e-mail joris.delanghe{at}rug.ac.be.

Recently, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer was developed to automate urinalysis. We compared UF-100 test results with those of an automated dipstick reader. A cross-check of UF-100, dipstick, and microscopic sediment data was performed in 1001 urine samples. Good agreements (P <0.001) were obtained between UF-100 and dipstick data for erythrocytes (r = 0.636) and leukocytes (r = 0.785). Even in urine with low conductivity, the UF-100 could detect lysed erythrocytes. The UF-100 bacterial count was higher among nitrite-positive urine samples (P <0.0001) and was positively correlated with the UF-100 leukocyte count (r = 0.745; P <0.001). In stored urine (24 h), bacterial counts increased, whereas the forward light scatter of leukocytes decreased (P <0.01). Casts and yeast cells reported by the UF-100 should be confirmed by microscopic review because false positives occurred. We suggest that a computer-assisted cross-check of UF-100 and dipstick data allows a clinically acceptable sieving system to reduce the workload of microscopic sediment urinalysis.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Lab MedHome page
Y.-L. Chen, M.-K. Chang, Y.-J. Chen, and B.-C. Chang
Comparing Neubauer Hemacytometer, SY Conventional, SY Located, and Automated Flow Cytometer F-100 Methods for Urinalysis
Lab Med, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 227 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Beullens, J. R. Delanghe, and M. Bollen
False-positive detection of recombinant human erythropoietin in urine following strenuous physical exercise
Blood, June 15, 2006; 107(12): 4711 - 4713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. Ottiger and A. R. Huber
Quantitative Urine Particle Analysis: Integrative Approach for the Optimal Combination of Automation with UF-100 and Microscopic Review with KOVA Cell Chamber
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2003; 49(4): 617 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Penders, T. Fiers, and J. R. Delanghe
Quantitative Evaluation of Urinalysis Test Strips
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2002; 48(12): 2236 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. R. Delanghe, M. R. Langlois, B. Wuyts, M. L. De Buyzere, Z. Zaman, J. Verhaegen, and S. Roggeman
Performance of Urinary Flow Cytometry in Predicting Outcome of Urine Cultures
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2002; 40(6): 2314 - 2315.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
T. Kouri, L. Vuotari, S. Pohjavaara, and P. Laippala
Preservation of Urine for Flow Cytometric and Visual Microscopic Testing
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2002; 48(6): 900 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
Z. Zaman, S. Roggeman, and J. Verhaegen
Unsatisfactory Performance of Flow Cytometer UF-100 and Urine Strips in Predicting Outcome of Urine Cultures
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2001; 39(11): 4169 - 4171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Apeland, O. Mestad, and O. Hetland
Assessment of haematuria: automated urine flowmetry vs microscopy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1615 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. T. Van Acker, J. R. Delanghe, M. R. Langlois, Y. E. Taes, M. L. De Buyzere, and A. G. Verstraete
Automated Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2001; 47(3): 556 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
A. Alvarez-Barrientos, J. Arroyo, R. Canton, C. Nombela, and M. Sanchez-Perez
Applications of Flow Cytometry to Clinical Microbiology
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2000; 13(2): 167 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.