Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 45: 1803-1812, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimberly, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waymack, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimberly, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waymack, P. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:1803-1812.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Selection, Validation, Standardization, and Performance of a Designated Comparison Method for HDL-Cholesterol for Use in the Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network

Mary M. Kimberly1,a, Elizabeth T. Leary2, Thomas G. Cole3, Parvin P. Waymack1 and for the Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network,4

1 Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724.

2 Pacific Biometrics Research Foundation, Seattle, WA 98119.

3 Core Laboratory for Clinical Studies, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

4 David Hassemer (State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, WI); Santica Marcovina (Northwest Lipid Research Laboratories, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA); Robert Rej (Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY); Thomas G. Cole (Core Laboratory for Clinical Studies, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO); Elizabeth T. Leary (Pacific Biometrics Research Foundation, Seattle, WA); Christa M. Boersma-Cobbaert (Lipid Reference Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands); Masakazu Nakamura (Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan); Chris J. Packard (Institute of Biochemistry, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland); David W. Seccombe [Canadian Reference Laboratory (1996) Ltd., Vancouver, Canada]; Ferruccio Ceriotti (Laboratorio Analisi Cliniche, H.S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy). Inactive laboratories that also participated in the study: John H. Eckfeldt (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Minneapolis, MN); Joan A. Waletzky (Department of Biochemistry, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH); Judith R. McNamara (Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA).
a Address correspondence to this author at: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop F25, 4770 Buford Hwy. NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724. Fax 770-488-4192; e-mail mmk1{at}cdc.gov

Background: Accurate and precise HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) measurements are essential for effective application of National Cholesterol Education Program treatment guidelines. The Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network (CRMLN) assists manufacturers of in vitro diagnostic products to establish traceability to the accuracy base. CRMLN sought to implement a designated comparison method (DCM) that overcomes the impracticalities of the expensive and labor-intensive reference method for HDL-C.

Methods: CRMLN evaluated candidate DCMs and selected one that uses 50-kDa dextran sulfate with magnesium ions as the precipitation reagent followed by measurement of cholesterol by the CDC reference method. After validating the method, we transferred it to all CRMLN laboratories and successfully standardized it using CDC frozen serum reference materials. CRMLN laboratories participate in monthly performance evaluations.

Results: CRMLN laboratories were able to meet a precision goal, as indicated by SD, of <=0.03 mmol/L (1 mg/dL) 94.4% of the time. They were able to meet a bias goal of <=0.05 mmol/L (2 mg/dL) for HDL-C <1.09 mmol/L (42 mg/dL) 97.3% of the time and a goal of <=3% for HDL-C >=1.09 mmol/L (42 mg/dL) 95.6% of the time. CRMLN is working to further improve its performance by implementing a bias criterion of 0.03 mmol/L (1 mg/dL) for all HDL-C concentrations.

Conclusions: CRMLN selected, validated, standardized, and implemented a DCM for HDL-C that is accurate, robust, transferable, and practical. The DCM is being used to assist manufacturers in calibrating their products so that ultimately, clinical laboratories using the products will more accurately measure HDL-C.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. S. Yee, D. V. Pavitt, T. Tan, S. Venkatesan, I. F. Godsland, W. Richmond, and D. G. Johnston
Lipoprotein separation in a novel iodixanol density gradient, for composition, density, and phenotype analysis
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1364 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
G. L. Vega, M. F. Weiner, A. M. Lipton, K. von Bergmann, D. Lutjohann, C. Moore, and D. Svetlik
Reduction in Levels of 24S-Hydroxycholesterol by Statin Treatment in Patients With Alzheimer Disease
Arch Neurol, April 1, 2003; 60(4): 510 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S Houterman, W. Verschuren, C. Oomen, C. Boersma-Cobbaert, and D Kromhout
Trends in total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol and their determinants in The Netherlands between 1993 and 1997
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 1063 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. R. Warnick, M. Nauck, and N. Rifai
Evolution of Methods for Measurement of HDL-Cholesterol: From Ultracentrifugation to Homogeneous Assays
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2001; 47(9): 1579 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. M. Muller
Implementation of Reference Systems in Laboratory Medicine
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2000; 46(12): 1907 - 1909.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. L. Myers, M. M. Kimberly, P. P. Waymack, S. J. Smith, G. R. Cooper, and E. J. Sampson
A Reference Method Laboratory Network for Cholesterol: A Model for Standardization and Improvement of Clinical Laboratory Measurements
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2000; 46(11): 1762 - 1772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. M. Cobbaert and T. K. J. Luderer
Total Error Evaluation of Roche Direct HDL-Cholesterol Reagent and Calibrator across 31 Lot Combinations: A 2-Year Experience
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2000; 46(1): 133 - 134.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.