|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Laboratorio de Marcadores Tumorales, Servicio de Análisis Clínicos, and
2
Servicio de Urología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, C/Maestro Alonso 109, 03010 Alicante, Spain.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 34-923222046.
Background: A new electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA) has been developed for the determination of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21-1) in the Elecsys 2010 immunoassay system. Urinary CYFRA 21-1 might have a role in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.
Methods: We performed an analytical evaluation of the CYFRA 21-1 ECLIA for serum and urine samples. The clinical value of urinary CYFRA 21-1 for the detection of bladder cancer was evaluated through its measurement in 226 urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic controls.
Results: At concentrations of 230 µg/L, within-assay imprecision (CV) was below 2.1% for sera and 3.3% for urines, with interassay CVs below 3.3% for sera and 4.9% for urines. The day-to-day CV was <20% at concentrations >0.2 µg/L (functional sensitivity). Measurement of diluted samples showed that the assay estimated CYFRA 21-1 between 98% and 103% for sera and 98% and 105% for urines. Recovery of added CYFRA 21-1 was 99105% for sera and 96115% for urines. We separately compared serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 ECLIA results with those obtained with an IRMA (CIS bio international). Regression analysis for sera was: CYFRA 21-1 (ECLIA) = 0.520 + 1.018 CYFRA 21-1 (IRMA); [95% confidence interval (CI) (y-intercept), -0.260 to 1.309]; 95% CI (slope), 0.9781.060; n = 100; Sy|x = 3.242; r2 = 0.987. For urine samples it was: CYFRA 21-1 (ECLIA) = 0.716 + 0.966 CYFRA 21-1 (IRMA); 95% CI (y-intercept), 0.0091.422; 95% CI (slope), 0.9560.976; n = 100; Sy|x = 4.136; r2 = 0.986. In urine samples voided by patients with and without bladder cancer, the best ROC analysis discrimination provided 81.0% (95% CI, 72.787.7%) sensitivity and 97.2% (95% CI, 90.299.6%) specificity at a threshold value of 5.7 µg/L.
Conclusions: Our initial evaluation showed reliable analytical performance for urinary CYFRA 21-1, which might assist urologists in the detection of bladder cancer as a noninvasive adjunct to cystoscopy.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
S.-J. Ding, Y. Li, Y.-X. Tan, M.-R. Jiang, B. Tian, Y.-K. Liu, X.-X. Shao, S.-L. Ye, J.-R. Wu, R. Zeng, et al. From Proteomic Analysis to Clinical Significance: Overexpression of Cytokeratin 19 Correlates with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Metastasis Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2004; 3(1): 73 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sanchez-Carbayo Use of High-Throughput DNA Microarrays to Identify Biomarkers for Bladder Cancer Clin. Chem., January 1, 2003; 49(1): 23 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sánchez-Carbayo, M. Urrutia, J. M. G. de Buitrago, and J. A. Navajo Evaluation of Two New Urinary Tumor Markers: Bladder Tumor Fibronectin and Cytokeratin 18 for the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 3585 - 3594. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |