HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pfeiffer, C. M. Articles by Gunter, E. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pfeiffer, C. M. Articles by Gunter, E. W. Related Collections Laboratory Management General Clinical Chemistry Nutrition

Comparison of Serum and Plasma Methylmalonic Acid Measurements in 13 Laboratories: An International Study

¹ National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341.
^a Address correspondence to this author at: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy., NE, MS F-18, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724. Fax 770-488-4609; e-mail cfp8{at}cdc.gov

Background: Detection of cobalamin deficiency is increasingly important, and methylmalonic acid (MMA) appears to be a useful marker. Information on interlaboratory variation and on methodological differences for MMA in serum and plasma is limited.

Methods: Using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, 13 laboratories participated in a 2-day analysis of 8 serum and 11 EDTA-plasma specimens. Results were analyzed for imprecision, recovery, and differences among laboratories and methods.

Results: The mean among-laboratory imprecision (CV) was 19% and 21% for serum and plasma samples, respectively, and 9.3% and 7.8% for serum and plasma samples with added MMA, respectively. The mean within-laboratory (among-run) CV was 13% for both serum and plasma samples and 5.2% and 4.9% for serum and plasma samples with added MMA. Within-method imprecision was the same or higher than among-method imprecision. The mean among-laboratory recovery of MMA was 105% and 95% in serum and plasma, respectively. Most laboratories showed a proportional bias relative to the consensus mean of up to 15%. Two laboratories reported results that on average were almost 30% higher than the consensus mean.

Conclusions: No method differences were found, but significant among-laboratory imprecision was found in the present study. Improvements are needed to reduce the analytical imprecision of most laboratories, and attention must be focused on calibration issues. Differences among laboratories can be improved by introducing high-quality reference materials and by instituting external quality assessment programs.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				L. M Rogers, E. Boy, J. W Miller, R. Green, J. C. Sabel, and L. H Allen High prevalence of cobalamin deficiency in Guatemalan schoolchildren: associations with low plasma holotranscobalamin II and elevated serum methylmalonic acid and plasma homocysteine concentrations Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2003; 77(2): 433 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Magera, J. K. Helgeson, D. Matern, and P. Rinaldo Methylmalonic Acid Measured in Plasma and Urine by Stable-Isotope Dilution and Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry Clin. Chem., November 1, 2000; 46(11): 1804 - 1810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]