HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gion, M. Articles by Dittadi, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gion, M. Articles by Dittadi, R. Related Collections Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization Proteomics and Protein Markers

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of CA27.29 and CA15.3 in Primary Breast Cancer

^a Author for correspondence. Fax 39-041-5294653; e-mail cnabo{at}provincia.venezia.it

Background: A new, fully automated method that measures the breast cancer-associated glycoprotein CA27.29 has become commercially available. The aim of the present study was to compare this CA27.29 assay with the assay that measures CA15.3 in primary breast cancer.

Methods: The study was performed retrospectively on preoperative serum samples collected from 275 patients with untreated primary breast cancer (154 node positive and 121 node negative). Eighty-three healthy control subjects were also evaluated. CA27.29 was measured using the fully automated Chiron Diagnostics immunochemiluminescent system (ACS:180 BR). CA15.3 was measured with a manual immunoradiometric method (Centocor CA15.3 RIA).

Results: In healthy subjects, CA15.3 was significantly higher than CA27.29 (P <0.0001). On the other hand, in breast cancer patients CA27.29 was higher than CA15.3 (P = 0.013). The mean value found in the control group plus 2 SD was chosen as the positive/negative cutoff point. The overall positivity rates were 34.9% for CA27.29 and 22.5% for CA15.3. The area under the ROC curve was greater (P <0.001) for CA27.29 (0.72) than for CA15.3 (0.61). Both markers showed a statistically significant, direct relationship, with pathological stage being higher in node-positive than in node-negative cases and in larger than in smaller tumors. Neither CA27.29 nor CA15.3 showed significant associations with age, menopausal status, or tumor receptor status.

Conclusions: CA27.29 discriminates primary breast cancer from healthy subjects better than CA15.3, especially in patients with limited disease. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm this conclusion.© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				T. L. Tinder, D. B. Subramani, G. D. Basu, J. M. Bradley, J. Schettini, A. Million, T. Skaar, and P. Mukherjee MUC1 Enhances Tumor Progression and Contributes Toward Immunosuppression in a Mouse Model of Spontaneous Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3116 - 3125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Bast Jr, P. Ravdin, D. F. Hayes, S. Bates, H. Fritsche Jr, J. M. Jessup, N. Kemeny, G. Y. Locker, R. G. Mennel, and M. R. Somerfield 2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2001; 19(6): 1865 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]