|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Department of Chemical Pathology, University of Pretoria, P.O. Box 2034, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
2
Severimed, Wiedaustrasse 202, 48163 Münster,
Germany.
3
Total homocyst(e)ine refers to the sum of the concentrations of free homocysteine, protein-bound homocysteine, the disulfide homocystine, and the mixed disulfide homocysteine-cysteine.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 27-12-3283600; e-mail jubbink{at}medic.up.ac.za
Background: Various methods are available to measure plasma total homocyst(e)ine (tHcy) concentrations, but whether plasma tHcy assays may be used interchangeably is not known.
Methods: Results from three different methods [HPLC with fluorescence detection, enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA)] to determine fasting (n = 163) and post-methionine load (n = 80) plasma tHcy concentrations were compared with those obtained by gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC-MS). Difference plots on non-transformed and log-transformed data were used to assess the agreement between HPLC and GC-MS, EIA and GC-MS, and FPIA and GC-MS.
Results: The closest agreement between methods was observed between GC-MS and FPIA for fasting tHcy concentrations, with 95% of the FPIA values between 19% above and 24% below the corresponding GC-MS results. Post-methionine load tHcy concentrations measured by EIA showed the least agreement with GC-MS, with 95% of values measured by EIA ranging between 52% above and 16% below the GC-MS values. With respect to GC-MS, the above-mentioned methods showed a negative bias for fasting tHcy concentrations, but a positive bias for both immunoassays for post-methionine load tHcy concentrations.
Conclusions: The agreement among methods is insufficient to allow them to be used interchangeably. The intermethod differences emphasize the need for standardization of plasma tHcy assays.© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
H. J. Huijgen, F. P.W. Tegelaers, C. H.H. Schoenmakers, C. J. Pronk-Admiraal, and S. Ekema Multicenter Analytical Evaluation of an Enzymatic Method for the Measurement of Plasma Homocysteine and Comparison with HPLC and Immunochemistry Clin. Chem., May 1, 2004; 50(5): 937 - 940. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tan, X. Sun, L. Tang, N. Zhang, Q. Han, M. Xu, X. Tan, X. Tan, and R. M. Hoffman Automated Enzymatic Assay for Homocysteine Clin. Chem., June 1, 2003; 49(6): 1029 - 1030. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Q. Hanson, J. H. Eckfeldt, K. Schwichtenberg, O. Aras, and M. Y. Tsai Interlaboratory Variation of Plasma Total Homocysteine Measurements: Results of Three Successive Homocysteine Proficiency Testing Surveys Clin. Chem., September 1, 2002; 48(9): 1539 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Nexo, F. Engbaek, P. M. Ueland, C. Westby, P. O'Gorman, C. Johnston, B. F. Kase, A. B. Guttormsen, I. Alfheim, J. McPartlin, et al. Evaluation of Novel Assays in Clinical Chemistry: Quantification of Plasma Total Homocysteine Clin. Chem., August 1, 2000; 46(8): 1150 - 1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |