HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Campbell, M. Articles by Davies, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Campbell, M. Articles by Davies, S. C. Related Collections Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization Hematology Automation and Analytical Techniques

Evaluation of Cation-Exchange HPLC Compared with Isoelectric Focusing for Neonatal Hemoglobinopathy Screening

¹ Department of Haematology and
² Imperial College School of Medicine, Central Middlesex Hospital, Acton Lane, London NW10 7NS, UK.
^a Author for correspondence. Fax 0181 965 1115; e-mail joan{at}dcs.bbk.ac.uk

Background: Central Middlesex Hospital, in northwest London, has screened neonates for hemoglobinopathies, using the established manual technique of isoelectric focusing (IEF) since 1989. Recently, this laboratory has faced a large increase in the number of samples tested per year. This study compared the detection of hemoglobin abnormalities between the existing manual IEF method and that of automated cation-exchange HPLC to determine the reliability of HPLC and whether an automated system would save time in the laboratory.

Methods: Over a 15-month period, 25 750 blood samples, collected by heel prick onto filter paper, were tested using HPLC, and the results were compared with those obtained with IEF.

Results: HPLC and IEF each identified 568 patients with FAS, 151 with FAC, 49 with FAD-Punjab, 23 with FS, 3 with FC, 6 with FSC, 5 with FE, and 1 with FD. IEF detected 62 patients with FAE, whereas HPLC detected 63. This additional FAE was observed on repeat IEF. One additional heterozygote detected by HPLC was initially not observed by IEF, but was detected on repeat IEF. HPLC detected all but six cases of Hb Barts observed by IEF. One double heterozygote and four heterozygotes were detected by IEF, but not by HPLC. The detection of hemoglobin variants expressed at low concentrations was comparable for the two methods, and carryover was not observed in routine analysis on HPLC.

Conclusions: HPLC is a sensitive, efficient, and time-saving alternative to IEF for the neonatal screening of common hemoglobinopathies.© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				L. B. Thomas, S. J. Agosti, M. A. Man, and S. M. Mastorides Screening for Hemoglobinopathies During Routine Hemoglobin A1c Testing Using the Tosoh G7 Glycohemoglobin Analyzer Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2007; 37(3): 251 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Joutovsky, J. Hadzi-Nesic, and M. A. Nardi HPLC Retention Time as a Diagnostic Tool for Hemoglobin Variants and Hemoglobinopathies: A Study of 60000 Samples in a Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Clin. Chem., October 1, 2004; 50(10): 1736 - 1747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Clarke and T. N. Higgins Laboratory Investigation of Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemias: Review and Update Clin. Chem., August 1, 2000; 46(8): 1284 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]