|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Acquired Intelligence Inc., No. 205-1095 McKenzie Ave., Victoria BC V8P 2L5, Canada.
2
MDS Metro Laboratory Services, 4489 Viewmont Ave.,
Victoria BC V8Z 5K8, Canada.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 250-479-0764; e-mail bsmith{at}aiinc.ca
Background: The Laboratory Advisory System (LAS) is an expert system interface that works interactively with clinicians to assist them with test selection and result interpretation throughout the laboratory investigation of a patient.
Methods: To study the influence of the LAS on laboratory investigations, a repeated-measures experiment using clinical vignettes was conducted. To collect baseline data on how laboratory investigations are currently conducted, clinicians investigated one-half of the vignettes using a conventional (noncomputer) approach. To determine the influence of the LAS on clinicians' behavior, the other half of the vignettes were investigated using the LAS.
Results: Clinicians using the LAS (compared with conventional practice) ordered fewer laboratory tests during the diagnostic process (mean, 17.8 vs 32.7), completed the diagnostic workup with fewer sample collections (mean, 5.8 vs 7.5), generated lower laboratory costs (mean, $194 vs $232), shortened the time required to reach a diagnosis (mean, 1 day vs 3.2 days), showed closer adherence to established clinical practice guidelines, and exhibited a more uniform and diagnostically successful investigation.
Conclusion: The LAS enhances the outcome of the investigation and improves laboratory utilization.© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
M. J. Poley, K. I. Edelenbos, M. Mosseveld, M. A.M. van Wijk, D. H. de Bakker, J. van der Lei, and M. P.M.H. Rutten-van Molken Cost Consequences of Implementing an Electronic Decision Support System for Ordering Laboratory Tests in Primary Care: Evidence from a Controlled Prospective Study in The Netherlands Clin. Chem., February 1, 2007; 53(2): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W G Simpson and P J Twomey Reflective testing J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2004; 57(3): 239 - 240. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Lim, K. A. Sikaris, J. Gill, J. Calleja, P. E. Hickman, J. Beilby, and S. D. Vasikaran Quality Assessment of Interpretative Commenting in Clinical Chemistry Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 632 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Kuilboer, M. A. M. van Wijk, M. Mosseveld, and J. van der Lei AsthmaCritic: Issues in Designing a Noninquisitive Critiquing System for Daily Practice J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2003; 10(5): 419 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Gopal Rao, M Crook, and M L Tillyer Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last? J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2003; 56(4): 243 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Regeniter, J. U. Steiger, A. Scholer, P. R. Huber, and W. H. Siede Windows to the Ward: Graphically Oriented Report Forms. Presentation of Complex, Interrelated Laboratory Data for Electrophoresis/Immunofixation, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Urinary Protein Profiles Clin. Chem., January 1, 2003; 49(1): 41 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bonini, M. Plebani, F. Ceriotti, and F. Rubboli Errors in Laboratory Medicine Clin. Chem., May 1, 2002; 48(5): 691 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A.M. van Wijk, J. van der Lei, M. Mosseveld, A. M. Bohnen, and J. H. van Bemmel Compliance of General Practitioners with a Guideline-based Decision Support System for Ordering Blood Tests Clin. Chem., January 1, 2002; 48(1): 55 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |