|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-6602.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Medical Research Bldg., Room 560, Nashville, TN 37232-6602. Fax 615-343-2551; e-mail michael.stein{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
Background: Prediction of cyclosporine (CSA) efficacy and toxicity in individual patients is difficult. There is no practical, biologically relevant, pharmacodynamic measure of CSA effect. A major effect of CSA is to decrease interleukin-2 (IL-2) production; however, measurement of this effect in isolated lymphocytes as a marker of response to CSA has been problematic.
Methods: CSA inhibition of phytohemagglutinin-P (PHA)-stimulated IL-2 production, measured by ELISA, was studied ex vivo in whole blood drawn before, and after subjects received 4 mg/kg oral CSA.
Results: Four hours after CSA was administered, the mean (± SD) CSA concentration was 702 ± 196 µg/L and PHA-stimulated IL-2 production decreased by 68.7% ± 17.2% (P <0.0001; n = 17). Twenty-four hours after CSA was administered, concentrations were low (64 ± 24 µg/L), with no inhibition of IL-2 production. A rapid, concentration-dependent response occurred. Maximum CSA concentrations (944 ± 187 µg/L) and maximum inhibition of IL-2 production (86.9% ± 13.7%) occurred 90 min after subjects received CSA. In vitro, 32.51200 µg/L CSA also inhibited PHA-stimulated IL-2 production in whole blood in a dose-dependent fashion with a similar IC50 (~300400 µg/L) ex vivo and in vitro.
Conclusion: In the search for a pharmacodynamic marker to better guide immunosuppressive therapy, the relationship between this simple, biologically relevant measure of CSA effect and clinical outcome should be determined.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. Sommerer, T. Giese, S. Meuer, and M. Zeier Pharmacodynamic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitor therapy: Is there a clinical benefit? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 21 - 27. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schiff, E. Cole, and M. Cantarovich Therapeutic Monitoring of Calcineurin Inhibitors for the Nephrologist Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 2(2): 374 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Millan, M. Brunet, J. M. Campistol, A. Faura, I. Rojo, E. Vidal, O. Jimenez, J. Vives, F. Oppenheimer, and J. Martorell Pharmacodynamic Approach to Immunosuppressive Therapies Using Calcineurin Inhibitors and Mycophenolate Mofetil Clin. Chem., November 1, 2003; 49(11): 1891 - 1899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hartel, L. Fricke, N. Schumacher, H. Kirchner, and M. Muller-Steinhardt Delayed Cytokine mRNA Expression Kinetics after T-Lymphocyte Costimulation: A Quantitative Measure of the Efficacy of Cyclosporin A-based Immunosuppression Clin. Chem., December 1, 2002; 48(12): 2225 - 2231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |