|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Laboratorio di Patologia Clinica, Ospedale Civile, 30027 S. Donà di Piave (VE), Italy.
2
Istituto di Chimica Clinica and
3
Divisione
4 Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera "S. Maria della Misericordia", 33100
Udine, Italy.
4
Servizio di Immunologia e Microbiologia, Azienda
Ospedaliera S. Maria degli Angeli, 33170 Pordenone, Italy.
5
Patologia Clinica II, Ospedale S. Chiara, 38100 Trento,
Italy.
6
Laboratorio Analisi Chimico-Cliniche e Microbiologia,
Ospedale Civile, 33053 Latisana (UD), Italy.
7
Dipartimento di Medicina di Laboratorio, Ospedale
Civile, 30015 Chioggia (VE), Italy.
8
Laboratorio Analisi Chimico-Cliniche, Ospedale
Geriatrico, 35100 Padova, Italy.
9
Laboratorio Analisi Chimico-Cliniche e Microbiologiche,
Ospedale Civile, 31033 Castelfranco, Veneto (TV), Italy.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 39-0421-227571; e-mail nbizzaro{at}dacos.it
Background: The ability of immunometric methods to identify anti-topoisomerase I (Scl70) antibodies is controversial. We wished to quantify the performance of the currently available commercial systems for the assay of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies in a large multicenter study.
Methods: Fifty Italian clinical laboratories analyzed 36 serum samples: 27 from individuals with scleroderma/systemic sclerosis, and 9 from a control group. The scleroderma/systemic sclerosis samples were positive in our laboratories by both ELISA and immunoblot (IB), and the control samples were negative. The laboratories used 42 immunoenzymatic (ELISA), 21 IB, 3 counterimmunoelectrophoresis, and 2 dot-blot methods, produced by 23 different manufacturers.
Results: We obtained 2389 results. The ELISA methods showed 99.2% specificity and 97.2% sensitivity for detection of anti-Scl70 antibodies. For IB methods, specificity was 97.6% and sensitivity was 96.1%. The Western-blot method had poor analytical specificity (27% false positives for anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies other than anti-Scl70).
Conclusions: Excluding Western blots, commercial ELISA and IB reagents as used in clinical laboratories have a sensitivity and a specificity >95% for determination of anti-Scl70 antibodies.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
J. D. McBride, F. G. Gabriel, J. Fordham, T. Kolind, G. Barcenas-Morales, D. A. Isenberg, M. Swana, P. J. Delves, T. Lund, I. A. Cree, et al. Screening Autoantibody Profiles in Systemic Rheumatic Disease with a Diagnostic Protein Microarray That Uses a Filtration-Assisted Nanodot Array Luminometric Immunoassay (NALIA) Clin. Chem., May 1, 2008; 54(5): 883 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Khan, A Alvi, S Holding, M L Kemp, D Raine, P C Dore, and W A C Sewell The clinical significance of antinucleolar antibodies J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2008; 61(3): 283 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |