Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 46: 224-233, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raungaard, B.
Right arrow Articles by Færgeman, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raungaard, B.
Right arrow Articles by Færgeman, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:224-233.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Flow Cytometric Assessment of LDL Ligand Function for Detection of Heterozygous Familial Defective Apolipoprotein B-100

Bent Raungaard1,a, Finn Heath2, Peter Steen Hansen2, Jens Uffe Brorholt-Petersen1, Henrik Kjærulf Jensen2 and Ole Færgeman1

1 Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Aarhus Amtssygehus University Hospital, Tage Hansens Gade 2, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

2 Department of Cardiology, Skejby Sygehus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 45-89-49-76-19; e-mail rau{at}dadlnet.dk

Background: Familial defective apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 (FDB) is caused by a mutation in the apoB gene and characterized by decreased binding of LDL to LDL receptors because of reduced function of the apoB-100 ligand. FDB may be associated with severe hypercholesterolemia and cannot always be distinguished from familial hypercholesterolemia phenotypically.

Methods: We used a fluorescence flow cytometry assay with Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphocytes to detect reduced LDL ligand function by competitive binding with fluorescently conjugated LDL (DiI-LDL). The assay was tested and validated using LDL from patients heterozygous for the Arg3500-Gln mutation and their first-degree relatives. Knowing the actual apoB genotype of patients and relatives allowed us to assess the ability of the assay to predict the results of DNA analysis. The results were compared to measurements of LDL ligand function in unrelated healthy control subjects to characterize functionally the Arg3500-Gln mutation.

Results: Fluorescence was significantly increased in cells incubated with DiI-LDL in competition with unlabeled LDL from FDBR3500Q heterozygotes compared with cells incubated with DiI-LDL in competition with unlabeled LDL from relatives or unrelated healthy control subjects. Thus, patients heterozygous for the Arg3500-Gln mutation had significantly reduced LDL ligand function. The binding affinity of LDL from FDBR3500Q heterozygotes was 32% of that in non-FDB relatives and healthy controls. The assay had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.95 and diagnostic specificity of 0.89.

Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of the assay was too low to allow reliable diagnosis of individual cases of heterozygous FDBR3500Q. However, fluorescence flow cytometry may supplement genetic identification of FDB and functionally characterize gene mutations associated with major reductions in LDL ligand function.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.