Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 46: 746-750, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schlank, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schlank, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Chemistry Forum
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:746-750.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Articles

Development of Standards for Laboratory Automation

Charles D. Hawker1,a and Marc R. Schlank2

1 ARUP Laboratories, Inc., 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108.

2 NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 801-583-2712; e-mail hawkercd{at}arup-lab.com

In clinical laboratories, the installation of total laboratory automation systems and/or modular systems has grown dramatically in the 1990s, particularly in the US, Japan, and Europe. As the number of installations and level of interest grew, several individuals and corporations active in the automation field recognized that the development of prospective standards might enable customers of such systems or equipment to purchase analyzers, automation systems or devices, and software from different vendors and retain interconnectivity of such equipment. These individuals also believed that the total market for automation systems and equipment would be significantly greater with standards than without standards, especially if customers were not forced to purchase everything from one vendor, and that there might be competitive pricing and new technology fostered via the standards. This early interest in standards development led to the initiation of a program by NCCLS in 1996 to develop prospective standards for laboratory automation. Part of the NCCLS effort has involved interaction and cooperation with other standards organizations in the US and other countries. This report describes the current status of the development of prospective standards for laboratory automation by NCCLS and the relationship of those standards to those of other standards organizations.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
N. Torke, L. Boral, T. Nguyen, A. Perri, and A. Chakrin
Process Improvement and Operational Efficiency through Test Result Autoverification
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2005; 51(12): 2406 - 2408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.