HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (34) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krijt, J. Articles by Kozich, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Krijt, J. Articles by Kozich, V. Related Collections Endocrinology and Metabolism

Measurement of Homocysteine and Other Aminothiols in Plasma: Advantages of Using Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine as Reductant Compared with Tri-n-butylphosphine

Jakub Krijt^1a, Martina Vacková¹ and Viktor Koich¹

¹ Institute of Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Ke Karlovu 2, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

^aAuthor for correspondence. Fax 420-2-2491-9392 or 420-2-2492-1127; e-mail jkrijt{at}LF1.cuni.cz.

Background: Aminothiols have been implicated in the pathogenesis of arteriosclerosis, and reliable methods are needed to determine their concentrations in body fluids. We present a comparison of two analytical methods and focus on the reduction of low-molecular weight and protein-mixed disulfides of homocysteine, cysteine, cysteinyl-glycine, and glutathione.

Methods: The plasma total aminothiol profile was determined by HPLC with fluorescence detection after derivatization with ammonium 7-fluorobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-4-sulfonate. Disulfides and protein-bound aminothiols were reduced by either tri-n-butylphosphine (the TBP method) or tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (the TCEP method); the effects of temperature, time of reduction, and concentration of reductants were evaluated.

Results: The intraassay imprecision (CV) was <3% for all aminothiols using both methods. The interassay CVs for total cysteine (tCys), total cysteinyl-glycine (tCys-Gly), and total homocysteine (tHcy) were <4% and <8% for the TCEP and TBP methods, respectively, whereas for total glutathione (tGSH) the interassay CV was >12% for both methods. Deming regression and Bland–Altman difference plots showed positive biases for total aminothiol concentrations determined by the TCEP method relative to the TBP method. The mean proportional biases were 65%, 27%, 6%, and 60% for tCys, tCys-Gly, tHcy, and tGSH, respectively. The calculated concentrations of total aminothiols by the TCEP method were less influenced by changes in temperature and concentration of reducing agent or by calibrator matrix.

Conclusions: The agreement between the TCEP and TBP methods was considerably lower for the determination of tCys, tCys-Gly, and tGSH than for tHcy. For total-aminothiol determination, the TCEP method yields better reproducibility and is more robust than the TBP method.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				G. Cevasco, A. M. Mumot, C. Scapolla, and S. Thea Ammonium 5-Bromo-7-fluorobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-4-sulphonate: A New Fluorogenic Reagent for the Determination of Aminothiols by HPLC Clin. Chem., December 1, 2007; 53(12): 2221 - 2222. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Toue, R. Kodama, M. Amao, Y. Kawamata, T. Kimura, and R. Sakai Screening of Toxicity Biomarkers for Methionine Excess in Rats J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1716S - 1721S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Peterson, M. E. Cummings, C. C. Vu, and B. A. Matter GLUTATHIONE TRAPPING TO MEASURE MICROSOMAL OXIDATION OF FURAN TO CIS-2-BUTENE-1,4-DIAL Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2005; 33(10): 1453 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]