Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 215-222, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hortin, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Laude-Sharp, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hortin, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Laude-Sharp, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hemostasis and Thrombosis
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:215-222.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Macromolecular Chromogenic Substrates for Measuring Proteinase Activity

Glen L. Hortin1,a, Ilka Warshawsky1 and Maryline Laude-Sharp2

1 Clinical Pathology Department, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Room 2C-407, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892-1508.

2 Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 301-402-1885; e-mail ghortin{at}cc.nih.gov.

Background: Proteinase activities are often measured using chromogenic substrates that are much smaller than physiological substrates.

Methods: The hydrodynamic size of macromolecular substrates (macrosubstrates) prepared by linking small chromogenic substrates to polyethylene glycol was determined by gel filtration. Efficiency of macrosubstrate cleavage by proteinases and {alpha}2-macroglobulin-proteinase complexes was monitored spectrophotometrically.

Results: Macrosubstrates had hydrodynamic radii of ~20 Å, similar to proteins with a molecular weight of 18 000. Different macrosubstrates served as efficient substrates for chymotrypsin, trypsin, and thrombin. Linking small substrates to a polymer variably affected substrate efficiency, with the impact on activity ranging from a 60-fold decrease to a 30-fold increase. Proteinases complexed with {alpha}2-macroglobulin had ~10-fold lower activity vs macrosubstrates than small substrates.

Conclusions: Macrosubstrates are efficient substrates that allow decreased measurement of sterically hindered proteinase molecules such as {alpha}2-macroglobulin-proteinase complexes. Thus, macrosubstrates may provide more accurate functional assays of proteinases such as coagulation factors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.