HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bruns, D. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bruns, D. E. Related Collections Laboratory Management General Clinical Chemistry Arnold O. Beckman Conference Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization

Laboratory-related Outcomes in Healthcare

¹ Department of Pathology, Box 800214, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Fax 804-979-7599; e-mail dbruns{at}virginia.edu.

Abstract

Outcomes studies, long common on the therapeutic side of medicine, are appearing in the diagnostic arena. Outcomes can be defined as results of medical interventions (therapies or tests) in terms of health or cost. The studies of outcomes are important because funding for medical interventions increasingly depends on them; a major accrediting agency even defines "quality" entirely in terms of outcomes.

The study of laboratory-related outcomes is complex. Multiple steps occur between testing and outcomes, physicians act unpredictably on test results, and outcomes studies have high costs relative to potential profit from the test. Study design often must specify the action that is to follow a test result.

The model outcomes study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The CONSORT statement, which is used as a guideline for RCTs of therapies, is largely applicable to studies of diagnostic interventions. Recent laboratory-related RCTs have addressed questions such as: "Does routine testing before cataract surgery decrease morbidity or mortality?" and "Does fecal occult bleed testing decrease the incidence of colorectal cancer?"

RCTs of tests are sometimes impractical. Other approaches include simulation modeling and the use of intervention and control periods of testing. As for RCTs, these approaches require careful attention to study design, data analysis, and interpretation and reporting of results.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				J. S. Madsen, M. Nybo, E. Magid, J. Hilden, N. Hornung, T. B. Larsen, L. Jorgensen, and P. E. Jorgensen More Studies on Outcomes Using Biochemical Diagnostic Tests Are Needed: Findings from the Danish Society of Clinical Biochemistry Clin. Chem., July 1, 2008; 54(7): 1254 - 1256. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M Bossuyt, L. Irwig, J. Craig, and P. Glasziou Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ, May 6, 2006; 332(7549): 1089 - 1092. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. P. Oosterhuis, D. E. Bruns, J. Watine, S. Sandberg, and A. R. Horvath Evidence-Based Guidelines in Laboratory Medicine: Principles and Methods Clin. Chem., May 1, 2004; 50(5): 806 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]