Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 1649-1659, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kumagai, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kumagai, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Immunology
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:1649-1659.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies by Use of an Enzyme Immunoassay with Nuclear HEp-2 Cell Extract and Recombinant Antigens: Comparison with Immunofluorescence Assay in 307 Patients

Nobuhide Hayashi1,2, Tomoko Kawamoto2, Masahiko Mukai2, Akio Morinobu1, Masahiro Koshiba1, Shinichi Kondo1,2, Soichiro Maekawa1 and Shunichi Kumagai1,2a

1 Department of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cyo, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan

2 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cyo, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cyo, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan. Fax 81-78-382-6209; e-mail kumagais{at}kobe-u.ac.jp.

Background: A new enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for automated detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) uses a mixture of HEp-2 cell extracts and multiple recombinant nuclear antigens immobilized on beads. We compared this EIA and an immunofluorescence (IF) assay in a large group of patients and controls.

Methods: We studied 492 healthy individuals and 307 patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Sera were tested by an automated EIA (COBAS® Core HEp2 ANA EIA; Roche Diagnostics) and IF. Samples were also tested for eight disease-specific antibodies, including antibodies against U1RNP, Sm, SSA/Ro, SSB/La, Scl-70, Jo-1, dsDNA, and centromere.

Results: Areas under ROC curves for the EIA were greater than (P = 0.008–0.012) or numerically identical to areas for the IF method for each of six CTDs studied. ROC areas for EIA were 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.95–0.99), 0.99 (0.96–1.00), and 0.99 (0.98–1.00) in systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 111), systemic sclerosis (n = 39), and mixed connective tissue disease (n = 33), respectively. For all 258 CTD patients with conditions other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the sensitivity and specificity of the IF method at a cutoff dilution of 1:40 were 92% and 65%, respectively, vs 93% and 79% for the EIA at a cutoff of 0.6. For the IF method at a cutoff dilution of 1:160, sensitivity and specificity were 81% and 87%, respectively, vs 84% and 94%, respectively, for the EIA at a cutoff of 0.9. For 207 sera containing at least one of eight disease-specific ANAs, positivities for the EIA and the IF method were 97.1% and 97.6%, respectively, at cutoffs of 0.6 and 1:40 (P = 0.76).

Conclusions: An EIA that can be performed by a fully automated instrument distinguishes CTDs (except RA) from healthy individuals with both higher sensitivity and specificity than the IF method when the cutoff index was set at 0.9. Moreover, it can be used to exclude the presence of disease-specific ANAs by setting the cutoff index at 0.6 with almost the same efficacy as the IF method.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. Lumbreras-Lacarra, J. M. Ramos-Rincon, and I. Hernandez-Aguado
Methodology in Diagnostic Laboratory Test Research in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
S Kanagawa, A Morinobu, M Koshiba, G Kageyama, N Hayashi, S Yoshino, Y Tokano, H Hashimoto, and S Kumagai
Association of the TAP2*Bky2 allele with presence of SS-A/Ro and other autoantibodies in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, April 1, 2003; 12(4): 258 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.