Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 48: 1751-1760, 2002;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2002;48:1751-1760.)
© 2002 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Automated Transport and Sorting System in a Large Reference Laboratory: Part 1. Evaluation of Needs and Alternatives and Development of a Plan

Charles D. Hawker1,2a, Susan B. Garr1, Leslie T. Hamilton1, John R. Penrose1, Edward R. Ashwood1,2 and Ronald L. Weiss1,2

1 ARUP Laboratories, Inc., 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108.

2 Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132.

aAuthor for correspondence. Fax 801-584-5207; e-mail hawkercd{at}aruplab.com.

Background: Our laboratory, a large, commercial, esoteric reference laboratory, sought some form of total laboratory automation to keep pace with rapid growth of specimen volumes as well as to meet competitive demands for cost reduction and improved turnaround time.

Methods: We conducted a systematic evaluation of our needs, which led to the development of a plan to implement an automated transport and sorting system. We systematically analyzed and studied our specimen containers, test submission requirements and temperatures, and the workflow and movement of people, specimens, and information throughout the laboratory. We performed an intricate timing study that identified bottlenecks in our manual handling processes. We also evaluated various automation options.

Results: The automation alternative viewed to best meet our needs was a transport and sorting system from MDS AutoLab. Our comprehensive plan also included a new standardized transport tube; a centralized automated core laboratory for higher volume tests; a new "automation-friendly" software system for order entry, tracking, and process control; a complete reengineering of our order-entry, handling, and tracking processes; and remodeling of our laboratory facility and specimen processing area.

Conclusions: The scope of this project and its potential impact on overall laboratory operations and performance justified the extensive time we invested (nearly 4 years) in a systematic approach to the evaluation, design, and planning of this project.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
C. D. Hawker, W. L. Roberts, S. B. Garr, L. T. Hamilton, J. R. Penrose, E. R. Ashwood, and R. L. Weiss
Automated Transport and Sorting System in a Large Reference Laboratory: Part 2. Implementation of the System and Performance Measures over Three Years
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2002; 48(10): 1761 - 1767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.