Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 463-469, 2003; 10.1373/49.3.463
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Margolis, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Duewer, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Margolis, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Duewer, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Nutrition
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Right arrow Drug Monitoring and Toxicology
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:463-469.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Certification of Standard Reference Material 970, Ascorbic Acid in Serum, and Analysis of Associated Interlaboratory Bias in the Measurement Process

Sam A. Margolis1a, Mark Vangel2 and David L. Duewer1

1 Analytical Chemistry Division, Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8392.

2 MRI Imaging Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129.

aAuthor for correspondence. Fax 301-977-0685; sam.margolis{at}worldnet.att.net.

Background: The accurate and reproducible measurement of ascorbic acid is essential in delineating the role of ascorbic acid as a diagnostic tool for human disease and for the comparison of data acquired by different laboratories. A stabilized pair of standards of ascorbic acid in human serum, which is compatible with most analytical methods, have been prepared.

Methods: The certification was based on the gravimetric addition of ascorbic acid to metaphosphoric acid-stabilized, ascorbic acid-depleted serum and NIST liquid chromatography–electrochemical measurements. The NIST results were analyzed statistically for homogeneity, and the expanded uncertainty of each SRM was calculated using all of the NIST data. An interlaboratory comparison exercise was also performed.

Results: These materials, Standard Reference Material (SRM) 970 Ascorbic Acid in Serum, Level I and Level II, are homogeneous and are certified to contain (10.07 ± 0.21) and (30.57 ± 0.28) mmol ascorbic acid/L of solution (expanded uncertainty), respectively. In the interlaboratory comparison (n = 17), the relative SDs for the two materials were 22% and 19%.

Conclusions: Two lots of serum, each containing different amounts of ascorbic acid stabilized in metaphosphoric acid, have been prepared and characterized. Many laboratories provide inaccurate results.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Lykkesfeldt
Ascorbate and Dehydroascorbic Acid as Reliable Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress: Analytical Reproducibility and Long-term Stability of Plasma Samples Subjected to Acidic Deproteinization
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2513 - 2516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.