Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 1483-1490, 2003; 10.1373/49.9.1483
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schrecengost, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schrecengost, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Immunology
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Hemostasis and Thrombosis
Right arrow Hematology
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:1483-1490.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies in Outpatients and Hospitalized Patients of D-Dimer Testing for the Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

John E. Schrecengost1, Robin D. LeGallo1, James C. Boyd1,a, Karel G.M. Moons4, Steven L. Gonias1,2, C. Edward Rose, Jr3 and David E. Bruns1

Departments of
1 Pathology,
2 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and
3 Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
4 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, 3508TA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Pathology, PO Box 800214, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Fax 434-243-5930; e-mail jboyd{at}virginia.edu.

Background: The ability of various D-dimer assays to exclude the diagnosis of thromboembolic diseases is controversial. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of two D-dimer methods in hospitalized patients and outpatients.

Methods: We studied consecutive patients for whom D-dimer testing was ordered for investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism. We measured D-dimer by an ELISA (VIDAS D-dimer) and an enhanced microlatex immunoassay method (Diagnostica Stago STA Liatest D-di). Patient diagnoses were based on imaging studies or, when these were not performed, on follow-up by review of medical records 3 months later.

Results: We examined 233 hospitalized patients and 234 outpatients with a mean age of 58 years (range, 1–92 years) and a female-to-male ratio of 1.4 to 1. Thromboembolism was present in 8% of outpatients and 12% of hospitalized patients. In outpatients, the negative predictive values were 98% [95% confidence interval (CI), 93–100%] and 99% (94–100%) for the microlatex and ELISA methods, respectively, at the recommended cutoffs. Areas under the ROC curves were similar for the two methods [0.77 (95% CI, 0.67–0.87) and 0.81 (0.73–0.89), respectively]. By contrast, in hospitalized patients, the confidence intervals for the areas under the ROC curves included 0.5 [0.60 (95% CI, 0.50–0.71) and 0.56 (0.44–0.67)].

Conclusions: For hospitalized patients, in contrast to outpatients, the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism is poor in a tertiary care setting, presumably reflecting thrombosis and comorbidities, other than pulmonary embolism, that increase the D-dimer concentrations in these patients. The patient population studied appears more important than assay method in studies of the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer testing.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. Jouveshomme, I. Bohn, and A. Cazaban
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalised patients: retrospective survey of an institutional standard
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2007; 30(6): 1117 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJGPHome page
K. Aschbacher, R. von Kanel, J. E. Dimsdale, T. L. Patterson, P. J. Mills, B. T. Mausbach, M. A. Allison, S. Ancoli-Israel, and I. Grant
Dementia Severity of the Care Receiver Predicts Procoagulant Response in Alzheimer Caregivers
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 14(8): 694 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. D. Brown, J. Lau, R. D. Nelson, and J. A. Kline
Turbidimetric D-Dimer Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Metaanalysis
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2003; 49(11): 1846 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.