|
|
||||||||
Hemostasis and Thrombosis |
Departments of
1
Pathology,
2
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and
3
Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
4 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, 3508TA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Pathology, PO Box 800214, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Fax 434-243-5930; e-mail jboyd{at}virginia.edu.
Background: The ability of various D-dimer assays to exclude the diagnosis of thromboembolic diseases is controversial. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of two D-dimer methods in hospitalized patients and outpatients.
Methods: We studied consecutive patients for whom D-dimer testing was ordered for investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism. We measured D-dimer by an ELISA (VIDAS D-dimer) and an enhanced microlatex immunoassay method (Diagnostica Stago STA Liatest D-di). Patient diagnoses were based on imaging studies or, when these were not performed, on follow-up by review of medical records 3 months later.
Results: We examined 233 hospitalized patients and 234 outpatients with a mean age of 58 years (range, 192 years) and a female-to-male ratio of 1.4 to 1. Thromboembolism was present in 8% of outpatients and 12% of hospitalized patients. In outpatients, the negative predictive values were 98% [95% confidence interval (CI), 93100%] and 99% (94100%) for the microlatex and ELISA methods, respectively, at the recommended cutoffs. Areas under the ROC curves were similar for the two methods [0.77 (95% CI, 0.670.87) and 0.81 (0.730.89), respectively]. By contrast, in hospitalized patients, the confidence intervals for the areas under the ROC curves included 0.5 [0.60 (95% CI, 0.500.71) and 0.56 (0.440.67)].
Conclusions: For hospitalized patients, in contrast to outpatients, the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism is poor in a tertiary care setting, presumably reflecting thrombosis and comorbidities, other than pulmonary embolism, that increase the D-dimer concentrations in these patients. The patient population studied appears more important than assay method in studies of the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer testing.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
S. Jouveshomme, I. Bohn, and A. Cazaban Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalised patients: retrospective survey of an institutional standard Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2007; 30(6): 1117 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Aschbacher, R. von Kanel, J. E. Dimsdale, T. L. Patterson, P. J. Mills, B. T. Mausbach, M. A. Allison, S. Ancoli-Israel, and I. Grant Dementia Severity of the Care Receiver Predicts Procoagulant Response in Alzheimer Caregivers Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 14(8): 694 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Brown, J. Lau, R. D. Nelson, and J. A. Kline Turbidimetric D-Dimer Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Metaanalysis Clin. Chem., November 1, 2003; 49(11): 1846 - 1853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |